↓ Skip to nominations ↓

These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.

Purpose

The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.

Guidelines

All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.

For nominators

Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.

Image page requirements

Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.

Creator

Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion

Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.

Technical requirements

More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.

Resolution

Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.

Image quality

Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.

Composition and lighting

The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.

Value

Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.

How to nominate

Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description  --~~~~ |}}

The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.

If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}

Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.

Number of nominations

No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.

Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.

Evaluating images

Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote

When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.

How to review

Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.

If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.

If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}

to

File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}

In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.

Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.

Grace period and promotion

If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.

How to execute decision

QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.

If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.

Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)

If promoted,

Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.
Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.

If declined,

move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.

Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red

Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)

Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 28 2025 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.

Consensual review process

Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.

How to ask for consensual review

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.

Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.

Consensual review rules

See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules

Page refresh: purge this page's cache

Nominations

Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:

--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 09:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms

If you are not ready to Promote or Decline an image, you may leave a Comment instead.

If someone else has already promoted or declined an image and you disagree, you may cast an opposite voice or use Discuss — this will move the image to the Community Review section.

If you agree with a previous decision, there is no need to cast the same vote again, as doing so only delays the final closure of the nomination.

Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).

October 28, 2025

- Nomination: Lucignano - St. Joseph Steps. -- Anna.Massini 08:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Review needed
- Nomination: Lucignano - Flowered corner. -- Anna.Massini 08:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Review needed
- Nomination Tail of the Airbus A310 Zero-G at ILA Berlin Air Show 2024 --MB-one 08:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:57, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Chevrolet Corvette convertible at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 08:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Koenigsegg Jesko Absolut at Auto Zürich 2024 --MB-one 08:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Nissan Stagea RS FOUR S --MB-one 08:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Mega e-Scouty at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 08:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Cerfs volants Berck 2025 --JackyM59 08:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:42, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Rouge-gorge dans le jardin en janvier --JackyM59 08:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Rouge-gorge en janvier --JackyM59 08:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Foggy gray funnel mushroom (Clitocybe nebularis, syn. Lepista nebularis) in the Bruderwald forest in Bamberg --Ermell 08:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 08:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Wooden chimes at the Liasgrube Unterstürmig environmental station --Ermell 08:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Hand pump at the Liasgrube environmental station in Unterstürmig --Ermell 08:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Pond in the Liasgrube quarry in Unterstürmig --Ermell 08:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sandstone column near Unterstürmig --Ermell 08:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 5 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: 5 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination View to the northeast, Ouirgane, Al Haouz Province, Morocco --Tagooty 07:43, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Lego mural at Fana'Briques at the Colmar exhibition center (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Sharpness could be better, but IMO OK for QI. But: There is no FoP in France. --XRay 08:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Lego seaplane at Fana'Briques at the Colmar exhibition center (Haut-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 07:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  A bit noisy. Otherwise good --MB-one 08:42, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 07:44, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Allegorical painting of the arts and the muses --Romainbehar 07:29, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Part of a carved wooden entrance door of Kukeldash madrasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 07:01, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Very good quality. --Gower 07:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Isteza madrasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 07:01, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Leaning to the right, but also not sharp enough. --Peulle 07:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Door of Isteza madrasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 07:01, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:22, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ibrohim Ohund mardasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 07:01, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  The dust spot at the right side in the sky should be removed. --Ermell 09:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Entrance gates of Oybinoq mosque. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 07:01, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View from the Cheeses Tower - Southeast of town --Benjism89 06:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View from the Cheeses Tower - Tower of the church of Our Lady --Benjism89 06:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View from the Cheeses Tower - West of town --Benjism89 06:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 08:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View from the Cheeses Tower - Filaterie street and Saint Marcel church --Benjism89 06:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View from the Cheeses Tower - Clock tower (square, foreground) and Holy Water tower (octogonal, background) of the former abbey church --Benjism89 06:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 07:11, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Galkin house, Karl Marx street 37, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Manasein house, Karl Marx street 45, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: House, Karl Marx street 47, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sapozhnikov house, Karl Marx street 53, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sandetsky palace park, Karl Marx street 64, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Portrait of a juvenile Egyptian goose (Alopochen aegyptiaca). --Alexis Lours 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 07:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination A black-headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) in flight. --Alexis Lours 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality as for flying bird. --Gower 07:21, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination A carrion crow (Corvus corone). --Alexis Lours 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Portrait of an Eurasian coot (Fulica atra). --Alexis Lours 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination A grey heron (Ardea cinerea). --Alexis Lours 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:51, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Bieżanów Cemetery, Mała Góra street, Bieżanów, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Bieżanów Cemetery, Mała Góra street, Bieżanów, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Kościelniki Volunteer Fire Department, 7H Pysocice street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Bieżanowska street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Energetyk Family Allotment Garden, 20 Niebieska street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Arenaria interpres (Ruddy Turnstone) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Arenaria interpres (Ruddy Turnstone) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Arenaria interpres (Ruddy Turnstone) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Arenaria interpres (Ruddy Turnstone) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Red-wattled Lapwing (Vanellus indicus) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Vragender-NL, windmill: korenmolen de Vier Winden--Michielverbeek 06:11, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Vragender-NL, church: the Sint-Antonius van Paduakerk --Michielverbeek 06:11, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Lichtenvoorde-NL, church: the Sint-Bonifatiuskerk --Michielverbeek 06:11, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion Good quality. --Llez 06:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  I see two problems here: verticals are slightly leaning CCW (fixable) and the upper part of the church is out of focus (unfixable). Sorry. --LexKurochkin 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination New residential building in Sidi R'bat, Souss-Massa, Morocco --Tagooty 06:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
  Left part is hanging a bit to the right --Michielverbeek 06:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  Good quality. --Llez 06:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  Comment I see two contradicting opinions here, so I have put it to discussion. --LexKurochkin 06:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Michielverbeek: The left-most wall is in fact leaning to the right. All other walls are vertical. --Tagooty 07:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Entrance sign at Sidi Rabat, Souss-Massa National Park, Morocco --Tagooty 06:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Entrance at Sidi Rabat, Souss-Massa National Park, Morocco --Tagooty 06:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Residential building near the beach in Sidi R'bat, Souss-Massa, Morocco --Tagooty 06:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Cantonal Police of the Canton of Basel-Stadt. By --Ahmet Düz 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  Oppose Weak sharpness and a lot of chromatic aberration --Jakubhal 06:29, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Pontifical Swiss Guard Band in "Basel Tattoo Parade 2025". By --Ahmet Düz 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  Oppose Blurred, tilted and bad crop at the bottom and left --Jakubhal 06:29, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Traditional costume groups from Baden, Baselbiet and Alsace in "Basel Tattoo Parade 2025". By --Ahmet Düz 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  Oppose Focus is on the audience on the left, and the marching people are not sharp enough. The image is also tilted. --Jakubhal 06:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination "Naarebainl" in in "Basel Tattoo Parade 2025". By --Ahmet Düz 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  Oppose Not sharp enough and A LOT of chromatic aberration --Jakubhal 06:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination “Three-country city” Weil am Rhein in "Basel Tattoo Parade 2025". By --Ahmet Düz 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  Oppose Not sharp enough, bad bottom crop, CAs --Jakubhal 06:25, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Shell of a Door Snail, Macrogastra rolphii --Llez 05:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Jurassic Park, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:44, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Jurassic Park, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.
  --Famberhorst 05:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:44, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Southwest portal of St Lamberti Church reflected in a shop window under the arcades on Prinzipalmarkt, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Maintenance and machine hall in the ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:29, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Bunker 15 in the ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Dirt road in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
  Oppose Blurry throughout, sorry --Tagooty 07:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  Done I have improved the sharpness and think that the photo is good enough for QI (even taking the resolution into account). --XRay 07:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sunflower in a phacelia field in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz Storage sheds on the flanks of the panoramic road between Waltensburg/Vuorz - Breil/Brigels.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Coprinopsis lagopus
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków --Jakubhal 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków --Jakubhal 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Awww! --Plozessor 04:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Wooden Greek Catholic Church of Saint James in Powroźnik --Jakubhal 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Wooden Greek Catholic Church of Saint James in Powroźnik --Jakubhal 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination View from Góra Parkowa in Krynica-Zdrój --Jakubhal 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Dried-up tree at the Zeilberg rock experience trail near Maroldsweisach --Plozessor 04:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Ecce Home statue in Schnackenwerth --Plozessor 04:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Meadow in the center of Urlesbachtal nature reserve --Plozessor 04:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination View from the Spitzberg near Limbach towards Zeil am Main --Plozessor 04:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Wooden eagle owl at the Zeilberg rock experience trail near Maroldsweisach --Plozessor 04:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Window of the Saint Julian church in Chevry-en-Sereine, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Lupus church in Bransles, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Martin church in Misy-sur-Yonne, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Martin church in Égreville, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Saints Martin and Felician church in Égligny, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Colias fieldii (Ménétriés, 1855) - Dark Clouded Yellow. By User:Ankit0908 --Atudu 01:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Closed wing resting activity of Lethe vindhya (C. & R. Felder, 1859) - Black Forester. By User:Rijuroy89 --Atudu 01:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Heliophorus epicles (Godart, 1824) - Purple Sapphire. By User:Ankit0908 --Atudu 01:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Pseudergolis wedah (Kollar, 1844) - Tabby. By User:Ankit0908 --Atudu 01:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Dodona eugenes (Bates, 1868) - Tailed Punch. By User:Ankit0908 --Atudu 01:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Acoustic shell, Republic Square. --Rjcastillo 00:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Tribute Sculpture to Ana María Campos. --Rjcastillo 00:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Entrance to Vereda del Lago Park --Rjcastillo 00:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination San Rafael Clinic Home Entrance. --Rjcastillo 00:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination he Saladillo Well, Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 00:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:43, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Female rusty blackbird with a seed in Prospect Park, Brooklyn, NY, USA --Rhododendrites 00:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Female rusty blackbird with a seed in Prospect Park, Brooklyn, NY, USA --Rhododendrites 00:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Female/immature Nashville warbler with a caterpillar --Rhododendrites 00:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Immature Nashville warbler --Rhododendrites 00:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Immature Nashville warbler --Rhododendrites 00:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Kalyan Mosque. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good picture. Categorization could be better (there might be a category for domes of mosques etc.). --Plozessor 04:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Muhammad Amin Khan Madrasa. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Toʻra murodtoʻra minorasi (the description in English is not a requirement, Gower). By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment dust spot. --Rjcastillo 00:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  To clarify: two dust spots above the terrace to the left of the tower. Easy to fix. --Екатерина Борисова 00:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Abdulaziz Khan Madrasah. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Kalyan minaret. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Comment There is posterization in the sky --Jakubhal 04:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

October 27, 2025

- Nomination: Relief of Kronstadt Naval Cathedral, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Relief of Kronstadt Naval Cathedral, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Relief of Kronstadt Naval Cathedral, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Petunia in Ekaterininsky park, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Petunia in Ekaterininsky park, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Panel of the altar of Our Lady of the Rosary - Resurrection of Jesus --ReneeWrites 21:06, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Panel of the altar of Our Lady of the Rosary - The ascension of Jesus --ReneeWrites 21:06, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Panel of the altar of Our Lady of the Rosary - The disputation in the temple --ReneeWrites 21:06, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Panel of the altar of Our Lady of the Rosary - The birth of Jesus --ReneeWrites 21:06, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Panel of the altar of Our Lady of the Rosary - The agony in the garden --ReneeWrites 21:06, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cultural heritage monument in Aachen --Grunpfnul 19:10, 27 October 2025
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 19:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cultural heritage monument in Aachen --Grunpfnul 19:10, 27 October 2025
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:08, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Grave of the family cockerill in Aachen --Grunpfnul 19:10, 27 October 2025
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Rencontres internationales de cerfs-volants de Berck 2025 --JackyM59 18:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Ota Darvaza aka "West Gates", Itchan Kala --PetarM 18:43, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Glass block window with stickers and graffiti, Calçada do Duque, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Garage entrance in a narrow street in Naples, Italy (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Gabriel with his cousin at Gulbenkian Park, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Bark or tree seems to be the main topic. Boys are totally blurred. --Gower 20:37, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  No, the boys are indeed the main subject. The idea here is to defy the conventional wisdom that the main subject should always be in focus. By blurring the boys I hide their identity while still letting the viewer see what they were doing (like in shadow puppetry) --Julesvernex2 22:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Female mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) standing on a shallow pond, Jardim da Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Empty arches of Praça do Comércio during the COVID-19 lockdown, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 19:09, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Orthodox Bishop's Residence in Kotor / Montenegro --Imehling 18:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Port and bridge in Rijeka Crnojevica / Montenegro --Imehling 18:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 18:55, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Piva Reservoir / Montenegro --Imehling 18:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support QI. --PetarM 18:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Piva Reservoir / Montenegro --Imehling 18:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Le Monument français de 1897 Place de Lille à Tournai --JackyM59 17:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Done Ok, but needs perspective correction --Imehling 18:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
  A bit dark at left, but I would support if perspective is improved, per Imehling. --Sebring12Hrs 22:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  Thanks for the advices --JackyM59 08:43, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination A non-self-propelled vessel of the Wasserstraßen- und Schifffahrtsamt at the barrage Güdingen --FlocciNivis 17:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 18:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion {{{2}}}
- Nomination View through the street Unterer Schenkgarten to the Heimesgasse 26 in Ingelheim am Rhein --FlocciNivis 17:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 18:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: A mine train at the Ensemble Rischbach-Anlage --FlocciNivis 17:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: The house at the Prälat-Goebel-Straße 14 in St. Ingbert --FlocciNivis 17:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  White area artifact at the bottom right. --Sebring12Hrs 00:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination A fresco in the Frauenkirche in Wasserburg am Inn --FlocciNivis 17:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Too much areas are blurred. --Sebring12Hrs 00:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ksar El KrikriyaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-71.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 17:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  It needs better categorization. --Lvova 00:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ksar El KrikriyaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-71.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 17:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  It needs better categorization. --Lvova 00:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Islam Hoja Minaret, Itchan-Kala, Khiva --PetarM 17:11, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --E bailey 00:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Hipolitów house, 3 Mariacki square, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Tenement, 7 Maly Rynek (Little Market square), Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Almost good, but why wall isnt't captured parallel to camera sensor? It would be better. --Gower 17:17, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Gower: Next time I’ll do it that way, sorry. --Igor123121 17:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Tenement house, 1932 design. Fryderyk Tadanier and Stefan Strojek, 5 Szczepański square, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose It lacks sharpness, the to is not sharp. Several areas aren't sharp enough. --Sebring12Hrs 18:37, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Triple-light east window with Netherlandish glass of the 16th century in St. NIcholas' Church in Dundalk, Co. Louth, Ireland --AFBorchert 16:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 16:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Panel with Netherlandish glass from late 15th century in the east window of St. Nicholas' Church, Dundalk, Co. Louth, Ireland --AFBorchert 16:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 16:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Baptismal font of St. Nicholas' Church, Dundalk, Co. Louth, Ireland --AFBorchert 16:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 16:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Feral pigeon, (Columba livia forma urbana), Siemianowice Śląskie, Poland. --Gower 16:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 16:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Traffic mirror, Siemianowice Śląskie, Poland. --Gower 16:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Imehling 18:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Waste bin, Siemianowice Śląskie, Poland. --Gower 16:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice for a waste bin. --Imehling 18:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Apple (Malus domestica) Siemianowice Śląskie, Poland. --Gower 16:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 16:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Polystyrene wall insulation in Siemianowice Śląskie, Poland. --Gower 16:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:43, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Volvo XC60 (SPA) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 16:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Citroën Berlingo III in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 16:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Yellow-rumped warbler on the Prospect Park Lake, Brooklyn, NY, USA --Rhododendrites 16:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 16:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 16:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Yellow-rumped warbler on the Prospect Park Lake, Brooklyn, NY, USA --Rhododendrites 16:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 21:08, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Female rusty blackbird --Rhododendrites 16:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Female rusty blackbird --Rhododendrites 16:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire Saloon at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 16:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination 1950 Jaguar XK120 Open Two-Seater at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 16:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Cupra Leon Mk4 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 16:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Gasr MednineCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-39.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 16:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Gasr MednineCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-39.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 16:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Not sharp, CA's here and there, bad perspective. Sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 00:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Mosquée el KhouchCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-87.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 16:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Very blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 00:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Wagon markings on a covered goods wagon (baggage car G10) belonging to the Deutsche Reichsbahn of the Cuckoo Railway
  --F. Riedelio 15:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Nice, but chromatic aberration at the bottom and color noise to fix. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 08:21, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Märklin freight wagon model (Shimmns-tu 718) for strip steel coils of the DB Cargo
  --F. Riedelio 15:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Märklin model of a Deutsche Shell AG mineral oil tank wagon
  --F. Riedelio 15:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Märklin model of a covered goods wagon (Gmhs 54) of the Deutsche Bundesbahn
  --F. Riedelio 15:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Panoramic view of Lake Braies --Kallerna 15:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  May be a bit tilted whan I look at the lake horizon. --Sebring12Hrs 16:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC) The lake has no horizon. And the water level seems ok to me. Additionally, all the trees are reasonably vertical. Overall, good quality for me. --Milseburg 18:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Gavnø castle --Kallerna 15:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Southern shore of Lake Braies --Kallerna 15:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Alt St. Alban (Cologne) at nighttime --Superbass 15:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Friedhofskreuz Dahlem / Eifel / Germany --Superbass 15:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 16:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination The Sulzenauhut in the Stubai Alps, seen from the southwest --Milseburg 15:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination The Sulzenauhut in the Stubai Alps, seen from the southeast --Milseburg 15:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lvova 00:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  May be a bit leaning at right. Otherwise very good. --Sebring12Hrs 00:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support But anyways... Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 15:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 15:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:37, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 15:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 15:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 15:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 16:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Lake Raduzhnoye and Sleeping Sayan. Ergaki Range, Western Sayan Mountains. --Argenberg 13:55, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:33, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Lake Raduzhnoye. Ergaki Range, Western Sayan Mountains. --Argenberg 13:55, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination View of Buiba Valley in Ergaki Range, Western Sayan Mountains. --Argenberg 13:55, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 15:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Buiba Lake and massive granite rocks in Buiba Valley, Ergaki Range, Western Sayan. --Argenberg 13:55, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Siberian pine cone with seeds and foliage. Pinus sibirica. --Argenberg 13:55, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ksar Beni Khedache in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 14:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  There is a huge dust spot left of that metal anchor, and another dark stripe (could be a bird) a bit more to the right. Otherwise very good. --Plozessor 04:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Ksar Beni Khedache in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 14:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Ksar Zemmour in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 14:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. Beautiful. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Ksar Zemmour in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 14:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 09:03, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ksar Zemmour in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 14:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Abbey of Escaladieu and Strain --Florent Abel 13:31, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Not sharp enough to me. --Sebring12Hrs 14:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Efremov - 2025 - Rowan in the City Garden --Юрий Д.К. 13:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Efremov - 2025 - Hawthorn in the City Garden --Юрий Д.К. 13:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Betula pendula in Yefremov --Юрий Д.К. 13:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Efremov - 2025 - Haval automobile --Юрий Д.К. 13:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 16:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Assumption Church of Gourgue --Florent Abel 13:12, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Not sharp enough. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 15:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 1968 Datsun Fairlady 2000 --TTTNIS 13:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Florent Abel 14:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: 1973 Ferrari 365 GT4 BB --TTTNIS 13:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Rear view of 1973 Ferrari 365 GT4 BB --TTTNIS 13:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination 1973 Ferrari 365 GTB4 Daytona --TTTNIS 13:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Florent Abel 14:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Rear view of 1973 Ferrari 365 GTB4 Daytona --TTTNIS 13:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Florent Abel 14:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination ZIL-130 at Khoja Porso street. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 12:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion OK. --Peulle 12:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination VAZ-2101 at Khoja Porso street. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 12:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Roof of Kukeldash madrasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 12:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment Visible noise and multiple dust spots in the sky. Can you fix it? --LexKurochkin 12:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Roof of Kukeldash madrasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 12:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment Visible noise and multiple dust spots in the sky. Can you fix it? --LexKurochkin 12:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Roof of Kukeldash madrasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 12:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment The sky is rather noisy with visible dust spots, can you fix it? -- LexKurochkin 12:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination House on Rúa da Fonte de San Miguel, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 12:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Florent Abel 13:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Detail of the façade od the IES Rosalía de Castro, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 12:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Florent Abel 13:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sculpture of Ricardo Carvalho Calero by José Molares, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 12:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Florent Abel 13:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Mass Turnpike, Charlton Massachusetts --PeterCooperJr 12:17, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lvova 00:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Pavillon_mauresque_à_cinq_coupoles_vue_de_l'intérieur --Atef Ouni 11:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 15:09, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Pavillon mauresque à cinq coupoles, le toit vue de l'intérieur --Atef Ouni 11:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Pavillon mauresque à cinq coupoles vue de l'intérieur --Atef Ouni 11:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Florent Abel 13:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Pavillon mauresque à cinq coupoles vue de l'intérieur --Atef Ouni 11:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Left part not very sharp. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Pavillon mauresque à cinq coupoles vue de l'intérieur --Atef Ouni 11:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Very nice but blurry/moved?/lacks detail. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sons of England World War I Memorial, Tecumseh Park, Chatham, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 11:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Sons of England World War I Memorial, Tecumseh Park, Chatham, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 11:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination St. John the Evangelist, Woodslee, Ontario, 2025-07-06; cornerstone --Crisco 1492 11:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Looks good to me. --PeterCooperJr 12:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination St. John the Evangelist, Woodslee, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 11:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination St. John the Evangelist, Woodslee, Ontario, 2025-07-06; entrance portal --Crisco 1492 11:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:31, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Tuman Oko complex, Shah-i-Zinda, Samarkand --PetarM 11:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Florent Abel 13:17, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Special stage 1 of the 40. ADAC Stormarn Rallye in Lütjensee, Schleswig-Holstein --MB-one 10:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 11:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Porsche 911 Turbo (type 992.1) --MB-one 10:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Wish the telephone pole shadow weren't there, but technical quality is good. --Crisco 1492 11:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Feral cat in Kadıköy, Istanbul --MB-one 10:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Digital processing made something very strange from the cat's hair. Sorry. Overprocessed and insufficient details. --LexKurochkin 12:43, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Nissan IMx Kuro Concept at Geneva International Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 10:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Cosmo Apartments at Plaça de Joan Peiró, Barcelona --MB-one 10:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 17:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Islam Hoja Minaret, Khiva --PetarM 10:43, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Hypericum empetrifolium --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:37, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Closed wing bird poop puddling of Bibasis sena (Moore, [1866]) - Orange-tailed AwletSubspecies: Bibasis sena sena (Moore, [1866]) – Indian Orange-tailed AwletThis image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Butterfly.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Rijuroy89 10:23, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Lacking detail, sorry. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination A great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus) swimming. --Alexis Lours 09:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination A great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus) swimming. --Alexis Lours 09:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination A grey heron (Ardea cinerea). --Alexis Lours 09:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:18, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination A Canada goose (Branta canadensis) in flight. --Alexis Lours 09:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Portrait of a common moorhen (Gallinula chloropus). --Alexis Lours 09:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 12:23, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Lepiota clypeolaria – Woolly-stemmed parasol mushroom in the Bruderwald forest in Bamberg --Ermell 09:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 09:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Common funnel (Infundibulicybe gibba) in the Bruderwald in Bamberg. Focus stack from 10 frames. --Ermell 09:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sandstone column near Unterstürmig --Ermell 09:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Milseburg 15:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sandstone column near Unterstürmig --Ermell 09:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:18, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Martyr and crucifix near Unterstürmig --Ermell 09:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Chota Gol Gumbaz --Rangan Datta Wiki 08:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose CAs. --Sebring12Hrs 09:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Upali Bruz, Bijapur --Rangan Datta Wiki 08:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose CAs. --Sebring12Hrs 09:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cross-section, wood of spurred mangrove - bois de Ceriops tagal --Ercé 07:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: File:Xonaqoh masjidi. XVIII asr.--26D 07:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: File:Kukeldash Madrasah in Tashkent.-- 26D 07:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 07:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination File:Exhibition Hall of the Academy of Arts of Uzbekistan. -- 26D 07:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Not sharp and no FOP in Uzbekistan. --Lvova 00:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Church side chapel --Romainbehar 07:18, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:11, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Charcoal drawing --Romainbehar 07:18, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Street lights on the promenade, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 06:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Nice, but too hight contrast to me. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  Comment Unfortunately, you haven't made a decision for or against it. Black-and-white photos are characterized by higher contrast. That's a conscious decision on my part. --XRay 07:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Sculpture “Silberne Frequenz” (Otto Piene, 1970/71, redesign 2012/14) at the LWL Museum for Art and Culture, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Bell and clock tower at the Juridicum building of the University of Münster (formerly the Faculty of Law and Political Science, now the Faculty of Law and Economics), Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination St. Peter’s Church spires in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 08:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Tower of St Lamberti Church from Cathedral Square, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 06:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 08:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sheathed woodtuft (Kuehneromyces mutabilis), older specimen. --Syntaxys 06:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sheathed woodtuft (Kuehneromyces mutabilis), older specimen. --Syntaxys 06:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sheathed woodtuft (Kuehneromyces mutabilis), older specimen. --Syntaxys 06:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Upper room of the former flour warehouse of the abbey - A preserved capital from the church choir --Benjism89 06:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Upper room of the former flour warehouse of the abbey - A preserved capital from the church choir --Benjism89 06:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Upper room of the former flour warehouse of the abbey --Benjism89 06:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Upper room of the former flour warehouse of the abbey - Reconstruction of the church choir, with the historic capitals --Benjism89 06:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View from the Cheeses Tower - The abbey buildings --Benjism89 06:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Laren Gld-NL, the reformed church --Michielverbeek 06:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Tympanum slightly burned. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Almen-NL, Ehzerwold estate --Michielverbeek 06:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Warnsveld-NL estate: Huize Baank --Michielverbeek 06:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination House, Karl Marx street 29B, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:04, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination House, Karl Marx street 29B, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:04, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Kazan Ratusha, Pushkin street 62, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:04, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Galkin house, Karl Marx street 37, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:04, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Left side looks unnatural due to perspwctive correction (upper left corner is too pointed and upturned). Can you fix it, please? --Екатерина Борисова 01:04, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sobolevs — Levshin house, Karl Marx street 35, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:04, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:34, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Pterocles indicus (Painted Sandgrouse) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Strix ocellata (Mottled Wood-Owl) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Paddyfield Pipit (Anthus rufulus) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Paddyfield Pipit (Anthus rufulus) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Red-wattled Lapwing (Vanellus indicus) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Leopard (Panthera pardus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 05:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Leopard (Panthera pardus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 05:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --26D 07:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Banded mongoose (Mungos mungo), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 05:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  There's some strange dusty/blurry area between his eyes and nose. --Екатерина Борисова 01:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Banded mongoose (Mungos mungo), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 05:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:01, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Marabou stork ('"Leptoptilos crumenifer), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 05:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:01, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: A camera crew simultaneously filming a television report for the “UEFA Women’s Euro 2025” in Basel. By --Ahmet Düz 05:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Water protection of the cantonal police of Basel-Stadt on the Rhine. By --Ahmet Düz 05:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination A Scottish bagpiper on the Middle Bridge in Basel. By --Ahmet Düz 05:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose A lot of strong CAs and a bad left crop (part of instrument out of frame) --Jakubhal 05:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: “Frolicking” people, shortly before the "Basel Tattoo Parade". By --Ahmet Düz 05:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: E-cars from “Emil Frey Classics AG” in Basel. By --Ahmet Düz 05:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  Comment chromatic aberration on the car and people --Jakubhal 05:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Left valve of a cockle, Lyrocardium aurantiacum --Llez 05:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Jurassic Park, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination King Kong, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:31, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Tribe of a dead Robinia, false acacia Focus stack of 2 photos.
  --Famberhorst 05:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz Natural phenomenon? These clouds above the panoramic road Waltensburg/Vuorz to Breil/Brigels kept coming together to form a whole, only to fall apart again.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Seed pods of a opium poppy (Papaver somniferum) Focus stack of 14 photos.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Nai-haiden, Fushimi Inari-taisha, Kyoto --Jakubhal 04:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) collecting tree bark in Bednarski Park in Kraków --Jakubhal 04:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:22, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków --Jakubhal 04:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków --Jakubhal 04:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:23, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków --Jakubhal 04:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 17th century hunting boundary stone near Fatschenbrunn --Plozessor 03:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Historic bakehouse in Käßlitz --Plozessor 03:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Church of Christ in Jesserndorf --Plozessor 03:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Statue of Mary Immaculate in Stettfeld --Plozessor 03:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Church of the Assumption of Mary in Mönchstockheim --Plozessor 03:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination City walls of Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Saint Cyriacus collegiate church in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:37, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Portal of the Holy Cross church in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Maison des Trois Pignons in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:37, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Tour César in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:49, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Russian orthodox cathédral St. Nicolay of Nice -- Florent Abel 02:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Hotel West End, police bicycles, Nice --Florent Abel 01:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:25, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Hyatt Regency Nice Palais de la Méditerranée (5 star hotel) --Florent Abel 01:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Courthouse of Monaco --Florent Abel 01:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 1 Chopina Square in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 01:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 1 Chopina Square in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 01:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 1 Chopina Square in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 01:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 1 Chopina Square in Kłodzko 4 --Jacek Halicki 01:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 02:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 1 Chopina Square in Kłodzko 5 --Jacek Halicki 01:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Bust Ruben Darío. --Rjcastillo 01:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:31, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Chiquinquireña Caravan (Relic of Our Lady of the Rosary of Chiquinquirá), Maracaibo. --Rjcastillo 01:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Oil rocker head (Pumpjack). --Rjcastillo 01:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Oil rocker head (Pumpjack). --Rjcastillo 01:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Bust Simón Bolívar. --Rjcastillo 01:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 01:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Ismoil Somoni mausoleum. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. By User:Красный --Lvova 00:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Door in Faizulloh Khojayev museum house. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. By User:Красный --Lvova 00:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Nurullabay's Palace. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Former building of the Russian Imperial Political Agency. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Harem of Sitori-i-Mokhi Khosa palace. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

October 26, 2025

- Nomination Leaves in autumn in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Leaves in autumn in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Manhole cover after rain in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Manhole cover in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Central panel of the altar of Our Lady of the Rosary - Crucifixion --ReneeWrites 22:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 22:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Panel of the altar of Our Lady of the Rosary - The visitation of the Virgin Mary --ReneeWrites 22:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Panel of the altar of Our Lady of the Rosary - The assumption of Mary --ReneeWrites 22:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Panel of the altar of Our Lady of the Rosary - The presentation of Jesus at the temple --ReneeWrites 22:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Panel of the altar of Our Lady of the Rosary - Christ carrying the cross --ReneeWrites 22:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Hardware Tools Supporting Wikimedia Projects logo --Suyash.dwivedi 22:00, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Shikh MosqueThis is a photo of the protected monument identified by the ID 82-75 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Bill.pix 21:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: El Khouch MosqueThis is a photo of the protected monument identified by the ID 82-87 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Bill.pix 21:28, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination 82-39 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Bill.pix 21:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Unacceptable edges, sorry. Look at the upper edges of the building. There are more problems such as cross marks in the sky or CAs.--Lmbuga 23:08, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination The summit of Raz de Bec in the clouds at Chaudun (Gap, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 21:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination The summit of Raz de Bec in the clouds at Chaudun (Gap, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 21:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination The summit of Raz de Bec in the clouds at Chaudun (Gap, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 21:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination The summit of Raz de Bec in the clouds at Chaudun (Gap, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 21:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination The summit of Raz de Bec in the clouds at Chaudun (Gap, Hautes-Alpes, France) --Pline 21:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 21:48, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination El Fsili Oil Mill is an important landmark located in Midoun, Djerba, showing how our ancestors used to make oil or oil products in the old wayThis is a photo of the protected monument identified by the ID 82-64 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Bill.pix 20:50, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Interesting image, but nothing is in focus here. --Екатерина Борисова 00:56, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Le Pont Renault vu du jardin de la Seine Musicale --JackyM59 20:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose PC is needed + bad sharpness/overprocessing by smartphone software. --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination La Tour Eiffel vue du jardin de la Seine musicale --JackyM59 20:33, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose PC is needed + bad sharpness/overprocessing by smartphone software. --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Tre Cime di Lavaredo seen from Lake Misurina --Kallerna 20:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Rock stack landmarks on the shore of Lake Braies --Kallerna 20:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Rowing boats on Lake Braies --Kallerna 20:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination The southern Farø bridge between Falster and Farø --Kallerna 20:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Panoramic view of Lake Braies --Kallerna 20:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 22:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination sooty copper (Lycaena tityrus) on a meadow in the Kröllwitz district of Halle (Saale) --Romzig 19:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Florent Abel 22:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Please sign with name and date (four tildes)
- Nomination: St. Peter's Church in Wörlitz: Organ --Romzig 19:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC
- Review
  Good composition etc. but horrible compression squares in dark areas from the left. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Synagogue in Wörlitz Park --Romzig 19:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC
- Promotion
  There's visible halo along the roof, and shadows are too harsh. Fixable? --Екатерина Борисова 00:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  Thanks for the review. I've uploaded a new version. --Romzig 21:22, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Looks much better, thanks. --Екатерина Борисова 01:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Fountain in front of Oranienbaum Palace at sunset --Romzig 19:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC
- Promotion
  Support Interesting composition. --Florent Abel 20:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Regensteinmühle near Blankenburg in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 19:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Islam Hoja Minaret outside the Khiva walls, Itchan-Kala, Khiva --PetarM 17:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Florent Abel 22:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Mosquée BassiCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-46.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 18:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Not sharp, overexposed, bad perspective. Sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 00:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Mosquée FadhlounCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-45.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 18:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Mosquée el JedidCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-85.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 18:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Mosquée BassiCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-46.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 18:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Not sharp and noisy, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 00:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Mosquée EttourkCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-51.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 18:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: City Hall of the former City of Kazimierz, 1 Wolnica square, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Too tight crop at the bottom for me. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: City Hall of the former City of Kazimierz, 1 Wolnica square, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: City Hall of the former City of Kazimierz, 1 Wolnica square, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination City Hall of the former City of Kazimierz, 1 Wolnica square, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose I don't like the composition: the windows at the bottom are not complete. If they are not complete, they could be cropped more so that the cropped and poorly presented cars that are in the way do not appear. In any case, the car parts are in the way. Perhaps if they were whole it would be different.--Lmbuga 19:53, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Tempel (Progressive) Synagogue, 1860 design, Ignacy Hercok, 24 Miodowa street, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination ‘Soledad, a Poppins de Sar’ by Joseba Murazábal. Avenida de Romero Donallo, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 16:59, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:11, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Windows of a building on Romero Donallo Avenue with the Palestinian flag in 2025. --Lmbuga 16:59, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:11, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Windows of a building on Romero Donallo Avenue with the Palestinian flag in 2025. --Lmbuga 16:59, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 17:11, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Bellver Castle..--Florent Abel 16:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Not very sharp. --Sebring12Hrs 17:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Montalbot lake, Vigneux-sur-Seine.--Florent Abel 16:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose I'm sorry, the detail isn't good, and the editing is even worse considering the small size of the photo. --Lmbuga 17:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Montalbot lake, Vigneux-sur-Seine. --Florent Abel 16:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Not sharp enough. --Sebring12Hrs 17:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Olympic rings, Cité du cinéma, former power station (1930/1932). --Florent Abel 16:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 17:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Capybara. --Florent Abel 16:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Sorry, the detail isn't good and the subject is blurry. The left side of the subject is blown out. --Lmbuga 16:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Roadside shrine in Potworów 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 14:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Roadside shrine in Potworów 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 14:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Roadside shrine in Potworów 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 14:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Roadside shrine in Potworów 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 14:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:11, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 1 Chopina Square in Kłodzko by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 14:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:28, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Hannah Lühmann, German journalist and author at the Frankfurt Book Fair 2025. --Celestinesucess 12:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Nice, but not very sharp, especially face. --Gower 12:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Fire damage from an incident of arson in 2022 at the trunk of the over 300 years old Dracaena draco tree, named Drago de San Antonio, in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 12:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 12:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Soluta Mountain Tea in the Garden of the El Portillo Visitor Center in Los Realejos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 12:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 12:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Polycarpaea in the Reserva Natural Especial del Chinyero close to the road TF-373 --FlocciNivis 12:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose This one is not sharp enough, sorry. --Harlock81 14:00, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination The building at the Bahnhofstraße 46 in Ingelheim am Rhein --FlocciNivis 12:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Passenger support carts at the Ensemble Rischbach-Anlage --FlocciNivis 12:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Rapper and writer Reyhan Sahin aka Lady Bitch Ray at the book fair Frankfurt 2025. --Celestinesucess 12:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:18, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Nelio Biedermann, Swiss writer at the Frankfurt Book Fair 2025. --Celestinesucess 12:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Maybe crop that thing at bottom? --Gower 13:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Joan June, author of the novel Bestie --Celestinesucess 12:11, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:18, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Empty arches of Praça do Comércio during the COVID-19 lockdown, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 12:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Empty Praça do Comércio in early morning during the COVID-19 lockdown, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 12:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 13:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Empty Parque Eduardo VII during the COVID-19 lockdown, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 12:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Empty Parque Eduardo VII during the COVID-19 lockdown, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 12:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Empty Parque Eduardo VII during the COVID-19 lockdown, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 12:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Joan June, author of the novel Bestie --Celestinesucess 12:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Good, but blacks clipped and the other person from the right can be cropped. --Gower 12:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Elisa Hoven, German Legal Scholar at the Frankfurt Book Fair 2025 --Celestinesucess 12:00, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 12:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Calibrachoa in the yard of Grand Hotel Palace, Thessaloniki, Greece--Umarxon III 11:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Poor quality, unsharp, not detailed. --Gower 12:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Shoe rack and resting visitor at the Sultan Ahmed "Blue" Mosque, Istanbul, Turkey --Lrkrol 10:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Quality not for QI, lacking detail, unsharp partially. --Gower 11:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Roof detail of St. Stephen's Cathedral (Stephansdom), Vienna, Austria --Lrkrol 10:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 11:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Stained-glass window of Sainte-Chapelle, Paris, France --Lrkrol 10:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 11:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Interior of Sainte-Chapelle, Paris, France --Lrkrol 10:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Too strong denoising and blacks clipped. --Gower 11:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Statue of Jeanne d'Arc, Notre-Dame de Paris, Paris, France --Lrkrol 10:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination The singer Gaëtan Roussel at the concert of Louise Attaque, Pause Guitare 2016. --Gyrostat 10:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 11:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Abdullaxon madrasasi ceiling. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 09:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  I recommend PC, it will be better with parallel vertical lines. --Gower 13:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  If you had bothered to look into the category, as I did, you would have realized that this is not a photo of a flat ceiling, but of an arch ceiling. --Екатерина Борисова 01:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sobiq Rossiya imperiyasi siyosiy agenti qarorgohining binosi. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 09:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 13:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sakkiz qirrali bino. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 09:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. But what it „Sakkiz qirrali bino”? --Gower 11:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  It is Uzbek language. Lvova 12:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sobiq Rossiya imperiyasi siyosiy agenti qarorgohining binosi. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 09:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 13:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Islomxoʻja madrasasi va minorasi. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 09:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. But could you enter English descriptions on nomination page? „Islomxoʻja madrasasi va minorasi” is not understandable for many of us. --Gower 13:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Comment "English description is preferred, but not mandatory". Also there's category in English. -- Екатерина Борисова 00:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Lower room of the former flour warehouse of the abbey --Benjism89 09:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 11:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Upper room of the former flour warehouse of the abbey - A preserved capital from the church choir --Benjism89 09:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 11:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Upper room of the former flour warehouse of the abbey - A preserved capital from the church choir --Benjism89 09:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Upper room of the former flour warehouse of the abbey - A preserved capital from the church choir --Benjism89 09:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Upper room of the former flour warehouse of the abbey - A preserved capital from the church choir --Benjism89 09:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cross-section, wood of tall-stilt mangrove - bois de Rhizophora apiculata --Ercé 09:06, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 12:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: seeds of white mangrove – Graines de Laguncularia racemosa --Ercé 09:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Moscow. CHP-12 power station --Alexxx1979 08:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 08:57, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Moscow. GUM (interior) --Alexxx1979 08:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Tram near the Musee Delta, Athis-Mons, Essonne, France --Tagooty 08:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Quite unsharp, noisy and underexposed, sorry --Benjism89 09:36, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Concorde F-WTSA at Musée Delta, Athis Mons, Essonne, France --Tagooty 08:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Underexposed and a bit noisy, probably fixable --Benjism89 09:36, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Benjism89: Done --Tagooty 12:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Not the best sharpness of the world, but ok. Exposition is ok now. --Sebring12Hrs 15:26, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Kyriad Hôtel Orly Aéroport - Athis Mons, wide view, Essonne, France --Tagooty 08:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 15:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Sebring12Hrs: Done --Tagooty 18:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Kyriad Hôtel Orly Aéroport - Athis Mons, Essonne, France --Tagooty 08:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Underexposed ? --Sebring12Hrs 15:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Done Raised exposure --Tagooty 20:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Slide tower “Giant Slide” in Basel. By --Ahmet Düz 08:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Not very clear. Note: PR template not needed --Tagooty 08:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination "Cadet Corps Basel-Stadt". By --Ahmet Düz 08:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Oppose Green and red CAs. --Sebring12Hrs 15:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Flags on the Mittlere Brücke on the occasion of the “Basel Tattoo 2025”. By --Ahmet Düz 08:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Comment Clearly tilted. Please, check the verticals after rotating the image. --Harlock81 09:40, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Oppose Perspective issues. --Sebring12Hrs 15:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Flags on the Mittlere Brücke on the occasion of the “Basel Tattoo 2025”. By --Ahmet Düz 08:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  I recommend adding personality rights warning. --Gower 12:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Oppose Perspective issues. --Sebring12Hrs 15:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Volkswagen Taos in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Hyundai Ioniq 5 N in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Flooding after a heavy rain in Astana --MB-one 08:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Scanner RHIB at Interboot-Hafen 2023, Friedrichshafen --MB-one 08:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Wooden gate in Vilnius --MB-one 08:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Wrocław combined heat and power plant seen from the Mathematical Tower --MB-one 08:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Zapornia akool (Brown Crake) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Zapornia akool (Brown Crake) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Indian Pied Starling (Gracupica contra) in Baruipur, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Large-billed Crow (Corvus macrorhynchos) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 09:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Pluvialis fulva (Pacific Golden-Plover) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Lysandra coridon,Olsztyn (Jura), Poland. --Gower 07:41, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Epitaph of Marianna Gutman, Assumption church in Bytom. --Gower 07:41, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support A bit blurry in full size, but good quality for me. --Harlock81 09:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Rat-tailed_maggot (Eristalis sp., live specimen in the water, Bytom, Poland. --Gower 07:41, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 08:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Alveoli on the surface of morel head (Morchella sp.), Poland, Bytom. --Gower 07:41, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Catnip flower (Nepeta sp.), Bytom. --Gower 07:41, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Not sharp at all, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 01:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:54, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 07:54, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Porsche 992 GT3 RS ar MYLE Festival 2025 --Alexander-93 07:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Aston Martin DBS V8 at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 07:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Aston Martin DB7 Coupe at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 07:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Statue of Madonna and Child --Romainbehar 07:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 09:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Fountain with allegory of river --Romainbehar 07:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Chekists house, Karl Marx street 23, Kazan. --Mike1979 Russia 07:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 07:18, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Podurueva manor wing building, Lobachevsky street 10, Kazan. --Mike1979 Russia 07:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination House, Lobachevsky street 10A, Kazan. --Mike1979 Russia 07:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination House, Karl Marx street 29, Kazan. --Mike1979 Russia 07:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Podurueva manor main building, Lobachevsky street 10, Kazan. --Mike1979 Russia 07:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  White aera artifact at the bottom left. --Sebring12Hrs 15:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  This is a barrier. If cut it off, half of the car will be left. What's the best variant? --Mike1979 Russia 06:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  Ahhh you are right, I don't know, but I don't like this barrier. Other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 00:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Exterior of the rose window of Dunfanaghy Presbyterian Church, Co. Donegal, Ireland --AFBorchert 07:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sanctuary of La Verna - Chapel of the Sacred Stigmata. -- Anna.Massini 06:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 08:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sanctuary of La Verna - Madonna of Refuge - Andrea della Robbia. -- Anna.Massini 06:53, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --26D 07:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Sanctuary of La Verna - The Annunciation by Andrea Della Robbia. -- Anna.Massini 06:53, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Review needed
- Nomination: Sanctuary of La Verna ̈ Incarnation by Andrea della Robbia. -- Anna.Massini 06:53, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Review needed
- Nomination Right valve of a cockle, Lyrocardium aurantiacum --Llez 06:41, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Ice Age, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 06:41, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 07:06, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Ice Age, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 06:41, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Pulpit in the parish church in Fulda --Ermell 06:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Side altar in the parish church in Fulda --Ermell 06:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Side altar in the parish church in Fulda --Ermell 06:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Left side altar with the image of Saint Aloysius in the parish church in Fulda --Ermell 06:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Deutz-Fahr AGROTRON K610 tractor with Unia Poznaniak 330/2F2.5D seed drill cultivating a field at the Bamberg Medical Center --Ermell 06:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:36, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Lent-NL, view to the village with two churches (the Maria Geboortekerk and the reformed church of Lent) --Michielverbeek 06:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 07:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Lent-NL, view to the village with two churches (the Maria Geboortekerk and the reformed church of Lent) --Michielverbeek 06:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Arnhem-Kleefse Waard NL, wind turbines along N325 --Michielverbeek 06:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Manhole cover at Khoja Porso street. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 05:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 07:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Manhole cover at Khoja Porso street. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 05:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 07:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Khoja Porso street, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 05:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Khoja Porso street, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 05:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Khoja Porso street, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 05:32, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.
  --Famberhorst 05:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Panixersee (Lag da Pigniu) above Andiast. Rock face above the reservoir.
  --Famberhorst 05:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quaity --Michielverbeek 06:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz Rock wall in the panoramic road between Waltensburg/Vuorz - Breil/Brigels.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Hortus Haren. Japanese flowering cherry, Prunus serrulata Jo-nioi.
  --Agnes Monkelbaan 05:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good qua;lity --Michielverbeek 06:18, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Aerial view of the Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA --XRay 03:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination View from the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA --XRay 03:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination View from the Empire State Building towards Central Park, New York City, New York, USA --XRay 03:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Manhattan skyline, New York City, New York, USA --XRay 03:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Gray brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira) at the Curitiba Zoo. A medium-sized South American cervid species, identified by its reddish-brown coat, simple two-point antlers, and crepuscular activity. --Wilfredor 03:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Broad-snouted caiman (Caiman latirostris) at the Curitiba Zoo. South American alligatorid species distinguished by its wide snout, prominent osteoderms, and average length of 2 to 3 meters. It inhabits freshwater environments such as swamps and lagoons. --Wilfredor 03:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Cape Barren goose (Cereopsis novaehollandiae) at the Curitiba Zoo. Species endemic to southern Australia and Tasmania, identifiable by its pale grey-white plumage, pink legs, and short black-based bill. It inhabits coastal grasslands and wetlands, feeding mainly on grasses. --Wilfredor 03:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 13:54, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sculpture of a Yakshi (Shalabhanjika) from the 11th–12th century, originating from Odisha, India. Carved in volcanic stone (gneiss), it depicts a semi-divine female figure associated with fertility and abundance. Yakshis, comparable to Greek nymphs, are part of the Hindu and Buddhist pantheons, linked to apsaras (celestial dancers) and gandharvas (celestial musicians). --Wilfredor 03:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination "Minstrel square" at Bettenburg landscape park --Plozessor 03:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Wooden ceiling of Saint Burchard cemetery church in Königsberg in Bayern --Plozessor 03:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Porte Saint-Jean in Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination City walls of Provins, Seine-et-Marne, France. --Tournasol7 03:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:22, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

October 25, 2025

- Nomination Intermeccanica Murena 429 GT at Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2025 --MB-one 20:55, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Cobalt motor boat at Interboot 2023 in Friedrichshafen --MB-one 20:55, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Phragmipedium sargentianum (ROLFE), Botanischer Garten Linz --Isiwal 20:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  High color noise in the background --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Crypt plate, parish church of St. Ägydius and Koloman, Steyr --Isiwal 20:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment I see strong color noise, very visible on side panels and in shadows, is it fixable? --LexKurochkin 14:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Ceiling design by Moritz von Schwind, staircase of Villa Wertheimstein, Vienna --Isiwal 20:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Tilted and something happened with stitching? (rod over the lamp is moved, crooked) --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Sunset, Sidi Rabat, Massa, Morocco --Tagooty 19:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Color noise to reduce. --Gower 07:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Gower: Done --Tagooty 08:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Gower 15:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Bougainvillea and palm trees, Sidi Rabat, Massa, Morocco --Tagooty 19:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Person from the left to crop/erase. --Gower 07:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Gower: Done --Tagooty 08:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Gower 15:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Tower of the mosque, Sidi Rabat, Massa, Morocco --Tagooty 19:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Probably too high PC --Gower 07:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Gower: Done --Tagooty 08:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Gower 15:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Building overlooking the Atlantic Ocean, Sidi Rabat, Massa, Morocco --Tagooty 19:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Plants at bottom are almost black and white. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination View along the Griesbadgasse to the Seelturm in Ulm --FlocciNivis 16:33, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) --Wilfredor 14:05, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  A little backlit and shadow are a little distracting, especially on the face. --Polinova 15:11, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Palace of Art, façade, 1898 design. Franciszek Mączyński and Jacek Malczewski, 4 Szczepański Square, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 13:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Generally good, but too tight crop at bottom for me. --Gower 09:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Kraków Cloth Hall, W avant-corps, 3 Main Market square, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 13:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose The composition is flawed by missing the very top (finial) of the building. --E bailey 16:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  Oppose Lacking detail. --Gower 12:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: St. Francis of Assisi Church, 2 Franciszkańska street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 13:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:02, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  Compression visible on the sky. Bottom cropped a bit tight. --Gower 12:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: St. Francis of Assisi Church, 2 Franciszkańska street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 13:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Compression visible on the sky. --Gower 12:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Moscow - 2025 - Andreyevskaya Embankment, Sergey Kapitsa Street --Юрий Д.К. 13:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Moscow - 2025 - A cluster of marigolds in a flower bed near GUM --Юрий Д.К. 13:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Kłodzko Hospital 4 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 10:11, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Highlights are outblown, could you reduce the brightness in those areas? --FlocciNivis 17:04, 25 October 2025 (UTC)@FlocciNivis: Done--Jacek Halicki 00:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:22, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Consulate of Croatia in Kotor / Montenegro --Imehling 09:15, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  It is leaning a bit. --Sebring12Hrs 10:47, 25 October 2025 (UTC) Done --Imehling 19:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: View of the Am Stadion building complex in Halle-Neustadt from the Heide-Süd vantage point --Romzig 09:09, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Tilted, could you fix it? --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Memorial stone of the first May Day rally in 1890 on the Bischofswiese in the Dölauer Heide near Halle (Saale) --Romzig 09:09, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination BMW iX at IAA 2021 --Alexander-93 08:48, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Would be beneficial to clone out the people behind the car, but in terms of purely technical quality it is QI (also, looks like the police weren't happy). --Crisco 1492 11:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: 2025 Toyota Crown Estate Z --TTTNIS 08:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Rear view of 2025 Toyota Crown Estate Z --TTTNIS 08:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: 1981 Ferrari 512 BBi --TTTNIS 08:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination 1967 Datsun Bluebird Estate Wagon --TTTNIS 08:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Not sure the shallow DOF is justified for a product photograph. Front of the vehicle looks great; the back is OOF enough that it shows even at thumb. --Crisco 1492 11:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Manhole cover at Khoja Porso street. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 08:04, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 09:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Volleyball, Bundesliga Women: Kinga Szücs (Schwarz-Weiss Erfurt, 10) --Stepro 08:01, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 07:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Tommy Krappweis, Juliane Leopold, Raimond Spekking, Manka Heise and Steffen Prößdorf, WikiCon 2025. By User:Martin Kraft. --Stepro 08:01, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 11:42, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: École primaire de Villers-au-Tertre--JackyM59 07:02, 25 octobre 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Perspective correction is needed. Walls should be verticals. --Sebring12Hrs 10:44, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  As Sebring, too strong PC. --Gower 09:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Four Domes Pavilion in Wrocław. --Gower 06:47, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Carl Volkmann pipe organ console, Elizabeth church in Chorzów. --Gower 06:47, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 13:48, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  The colours look unnatural to me. Shouldn't thet music book be white? --JoachimKohler-HB 18:40, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  Colours are unnatural indeed, because that church has unusual old-type lighting unfortunately... It is visible also on other pictures. Paper is creamy in that case. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination The new train station in Eggolsheim, aerial view --Ermell 05:57, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Left side leaning in --Poco a poco 07:38, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 18:09, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Yes, QI now after correction --Poco a poco 19:06, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Phacelia field in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:05, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

October 24, 2025

- Nomination Tulips in Primorsky Park of Victory, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Rhododendron in Primorsky Park of Victory, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Remains of bridge in Ropsha Estate park, Ropsha, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Lacks detai (probably because aperture value) --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Lake Wörlitz with gondolas in the evening --Romzig 21:12, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  I would say the main subject is not the see, could you please add an additional cat? --Poco a poco 07:42, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  Thanks for the review. I've add a cat. ;-) --Romzig 08:57, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Better --Poco a poco 19:08, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Regenstein Castle ruins near Blankenburg in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 21:12, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Compression 'squares' visible. Not very detailed textures. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Lutherbuche near Stolberg in the Harz Mountains, stamp point 216 of the Harzer Wandernadel (HWN) --Romzig 21:12, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Hiking trail near Hohegeiß in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 21:12, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Thick-walled maze polypore (Fomitopsis quercina) on a stub -- George Chernilevsky 19:06, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: New construction of the Pfaffendorf Bridge in Koblenz -- Rolf Kranz 18:18, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Many grid-like artifacts in different parts of picture (sky, water), partially unsharp. --Gower 21:13, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Fritscha tenement, 1 Little Market Square, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:07, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Rondeau West Front Range Lighthouse, Erieau, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 16:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Not sharp. --Екатерина Борисова 00:40, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  The subject (lighthouse) is sharp enough that you can read the sign. The pedestrians are not the subject. --Crisco 1492 11:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  I meant. that the lighthouse and the sign on it are also not sharp (though not so blurry as the pedestrians). Let's wait for other opinions. --Екатерина Борисова 01:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Southern side of St. Tryphon Square in Kotor / Montenegro --Imehling 12:02, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  It looks underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 12:43, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
  Just an early morning picture. I've uploaded a new version. Maybe better now. --Imehling 19:52, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
  Light is good now, but there are strong purple CAs at left and right. --Sebring12Hrs 02:31, 25 October 2025 (UTC) Done --Imehling 09:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Clock Tower of Kotor / Montenegro --Imehling 12:02, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Škoda Elroq at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 11:29, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Cabin details of a Gulfstream G550 executive jet at EBACE 2023, Le Grand-Saconnex, Canton of Geneva --MB-one 10:44, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Amazone UF 1302 field sprayer at Agritechnica 2023, Hanover, Lower Saxony --MB-one 10:44, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Ribnitzer Stadtforst in Dierhagen, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern --MB-one 10:44, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Underexposed. --Екатерина Борисова 01:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Façade Mosquée el Khouch --Atef Ouni 08:48, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Good, but overall grainy, can you reduce it a bit? --Gower 21:13, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Mosquée Shikh --Atef Ouni 08:48, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review The sides are leaning out, perspective correction needed.--Peulle 09:54, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
  PC needed: look at the door from the left. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination St. John and Paul Martyrs church in Katowice, church organ console. --Gower 07:16, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 08:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination St. John and Paul Martyrs church in Katowice, painting in the altarpiece with patrons of church by painter Winter. --Gower 07:16, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Lvova 00:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Warszawa II winding tower in Katowice. --Gower 07:16, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 08:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Bytom, 36-34 Dworcowa Street, tenement houses. --Gower 07:16, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Isiwal 08:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Please sign with name and date (four tildes)
- Nomination: Ancien cimetière de Villers-au-Tertre--JackyM59 07:09, 24 octobre 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  @JackyM59: please, use 4 tildas. --Lvova 12:41, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Phoques en baie d'Authie --JackyM59 07:09, 24 octobre 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Horizon is tilted --Gower 20:42, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
  Oppose Not a very good focus and tilted. --Sebring12Hrs 09:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes)
- Nomination: Salle des Fêtes de Villers-au-Tertre--JackyM59 07:09, 24 octobre 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes) Please sign with name and date (four tildes)
- Nomination: Monument aux morts de Monchecourt--JackyM59 07:09, 24 octobre 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Construction site of the underpass at Buttenheim station --Ermell 05:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:08, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Construction site at Buttenheim station --Ermell 05:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Too high contrast, blacks clipped. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination These XXL soccer balls were found everywhere, in select corners of the city. Here's an example, in front of the Spielzeug Welten Museum Basel. By --Ahmet Düz 04:42, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Comment chromatic aberrations --Jakubhal 05:47, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support CA are negligible IMO --MB-one 13:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Sea foam washed up on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:23, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Support Good quality. --Gower 21:13, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
  I like that image, the composition and the play with bokeh are good (if needed: Support). In fact, I'd prefer this image over a similar candidate from 2 weeks ago, the artistical (for lack of a better word) quality is higher. That said, I am a bit puzzled. I certainly see a sharp area, where the foam bubbles lie the most in a shadow (follow the white track from bottom right until you reach the first dark area). But this area of scharpness does not extend linearly, it rather looks like a more or less rounded sharpness area. It's an interesting phenomenon, I think that's attributable to pecularities of the used telephoto lens. --Grand-Duc 21:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  So it is a contra and we need a discussion or is it a comment and back to pro? --XRay 07:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Two red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans) on rocks beside the water. This semi-aquatic species, native to the southern United States and northern Mexico, is characterized by the red stripes on the sides of its head. --Wilfredor 01:06, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:08, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Monument aux morts à Grand-Popo au Bénin, aux enfants 1914-1918, 1939-1945 --Fawaz.tairou 00:14, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality as for iPhone. --Gower 09:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Côtes de l'île de Gorée au Sénégal, vues de l'océan atlantique --Fawaz.tairou 00:14, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Île de Gorée vue de la chaloupe --Fawaz.tairou 00:14, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Island is too dark. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

October 23, 2025

- Nomination Rhododendron in Primorsky Park of Victory, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:24, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Trophée Wikimédiens de l'année 2025 - Wikimania 2025 à Nairobi. --Fawaz.tairou 23:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  The background is distracting for this composition. I suggest trying a tighter crop on the subject. --E bailey 16:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Wikimania 2025 - Chambre au Trademark Hotel --Fawaz.tairou 23:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  The subject is a hotel room in Nairobi. Why is it important to describe this as Wikimania 2025? I don't see any part of the subject relevant to the event. --E bailey 16:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Wikimania 2025 - Chambre au Trademark Hotel --Fawaz.tairou 23:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:06, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Chiesa Parrocchiale della Madonna del Carmine. Noto, Sicily --Ввласенко 20:32, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Öjeby kyrka --Brackenheim 19:42, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Please, apply a vertical perspective correction, there is also CA in the tree --Poco a poco 20:29, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Öjeby kyrka --Brackenheim 19:42, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  It lacks a perspective correction --Poco a poco 20:29, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  Done --Brackenheim 17:57, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Chwalibogowski tenement house, 13 św. Jana street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 19:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Horizontal alignment is needed. --Екатерина Борисова 23:41, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Stary (Old) Theater, 5 Jagiellonska street, Old Town, Krakow, Poland --Igor123121 19:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Building of the Polish Academy of Learning, 1857 design. Filip Pokutyński, 17 Sławkowska Street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 19:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Tenement house, 30 św. Wawrzyńca street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 19:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Tenement house, 13 Krakowska street, Wesoła, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 19:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Windows cat missing --Poco a poco 20:30, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  Horizontal alignment is needed. --Екатерина Борисова 23:44, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Tosh Gate ("South Gate"), Khiva --PetarM 17:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Is it possible to denoise the sky? --Lvova 19:24, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Lvova It was alredy done. I dont see noise as problem here and it's still in full size (50 Mpx). --PetarM 08:38, 24 October 2025 (UTC) @LvovaNow you have double denoise. Enjoy. --PetarM 09:22, 24 October 2025 (UTC) Comment Can anyone check this photo, since i see no "mistakes". --PetarM 15:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Franciszek Kachel Park in Bytom, Południowy pond. --Gower 16:33, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Both sides are blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 01:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Incinerator building in Bytom. --Gower 16:33, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Mosque Sellaouti in Djerba in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 13:56, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Huge dust spot on sky to remove. --Gower 16:42, 23 October 2025 (UTC) dear Gower I removed it --IssamBarhoumi 20:37, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  thanks, but 2 another also to remove (I marked them by imagenote) --Gower 20:46, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Mosque Sellaouti in Djerba in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 13:56, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Bicycle polo at VELOBerlin 2024 at Tempelhofer Feld, Berlin --MB-one 13:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:06, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: BMW M4 CSL at Essen Motor Show 2024 --MB-one 13:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: 1950s Mercury sedan at Techno-Classica 2024, Essen --MB-one 13:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Church of the Immaculate Conception in Kłodzko 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:28, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Can't find anything in focus here. --Екатерина Борисова 23:49, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  Background is in focus ;) --Gower 07:07, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Strix ocellata (Mottled Wood-Owl) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 12:24, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  It's a bit noisy, which is disturbing esp. in the out of focus leaves --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: File:Extérieur Mosquée el Kbob avec puit au premier plan --Atef Ouni 10:19, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  The foreground with this piece of something is very blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 23:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Mosquée Sellaouti --Atef Ouni 10:19, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Needs a bit of perspective correction; both sides are leaning in. Otherwise good.--Peulle 10:49, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Lighthouse (1818), Lighthouse Conservation Area, Tilbury, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 10:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Seems underexposed, otherwise good --Benjism89 16:25, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  The peak of the lighthouse was in shadow at the time. This is consistent with items such as File:Lighthouse (1818), Lighthouse Conservation Area, Tilbury, Ontario, 2025-07-06 02.jpg, taken the same day (with slightly different lighting). --Crisco 1492 11:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Previously unassessed. --Lvova 09:45, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  I would crop a little from top an bottom and make the description a bit more specific that "Animals of Thessaloniki". But I like it. --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Forsskaolea angustifolia at the Mirador de Chirche in Chirche, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 05:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 08:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cabbage-leaved Sea Lavender cultivated in the Drago Park, Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 05:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Generally good, but not very detailed (flowers), sorry. --Gower 08:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Cinquefoil in the Langwieder Heide --FlocciNivis 05:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 09:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: The pedestrian tunnel underneath the Oskar-von-Miller-Ring as Munich Art Tunnel with Graffiti --FlocciNivis 05:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Unaesthetic flash(?) shadow in centre. --Gower 16:42, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  I did a different crop now restricting the image to the graffiti --FlocciNivis 17:55, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: A completed Apé, shortly before opening. By--Ahmet Düz 04:55, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Burnt highlights in the background while main subject is in shadow. Might be acceptable though if the strong CAs where fixed --Benjism89 16:25, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Catherine Branson at the Julia Gillard Public Lecture 2025. By --Pangalau 03:37, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Blurry in full resolution --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Catherine Branson at the Julia Gillard Public Lecture 2025. By --Pangalau 03:37, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Blurry in full resolution --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Catherine Branson at the Julia Gillard Public Lecture 2025. By --Pangalau 03:37, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Blurry in full resolution --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Catherine Branson at the Julia Gillard Public Lecture 2025. By --Pangalau 03:37, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  very noisy. Could be improved in editor. --E bailey 16:38, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

October 22, 2025

- Nomination Fire station in Vyborg, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Fire station in Vyborg, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Good, but not very sharp. --Gower 09:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Tomb effigy of Nicholas of Salm-Salm --ReneeWrites 23:35, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Not sharp enough. --Екатерина Борисова 01:40, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Epitaph of Philip de Lalaing and Anna van Rennenberg and their 13 children --ReneeWrites 23:35, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Small coastal containership, PICTOR J, moored at Reykjavik Harbor, Iceland --GRDN711 23:23, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Nice image, but focus is sharp on the stern of the ship and blurry towards the bow (left side of image). --E bailey 16:42, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Pietà between Saints John the Evangelist, Mary Magdalene, Francis, Michael the Archangel, Anthony of Padua and Jerome by Santi Buglioni and assistants (1525-1532) - La Verna Sanctuary (Chiusi della Verna).-- Anna.Massini 20:14, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Dock on the Thames River, Chatham, Ontario, 2025-07-05 --Crisco 1492 18:15, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  There is a good sense of being a fine summer day down beside the Thames River but the dead black branch on the right detracts from the composition. Moving a foot to the left would have removed it from the image. --GRDN711 23:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Tenement house, 11 Stolarska street, Kraków, Poland.jpg --Igor123121 17:35, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Pod Pająkiem (Under the Spider) tenement house, 1889 design. Teodor Talowski, 35 Karmelicka street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:35, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Unfavorable cropping (disturbing traffic signs), fixable? --F. Riedelio 15:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Palm house in Wałbrzych, Poland.--Gower 15:32, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support A bit dark, but still ok --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Mufti of Tunisia with Imams of Mosque Zitouna and other mosques celebrating the 27th night of Ramadan a great celebration in Islam this celebration is held in front of Mosque Zitouna Mihrab. --IssamBarhoumi 14:03, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Quite noisy and probably not at full resolution. Should be fixable though --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Meadow in early Autumn in the Mönchbruch nature reserve in Rüsselsheim am Main, Hessen --MB-one 12:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Two Aston Martin sportscars of different eras at Classic-Gala Schwetzingen 2025 --MB-one 12:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Moscow - 2025 - Side view of tower of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia --Юрий Д.К. 10:41, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Rear view of 2024 Lexus LBX Elegant --TTTNIS 10:31, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Lexus LM500h Version L --TTTNIS 10:31, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Rear view of Lexus LM500h Version L --TTTNIS 10:31, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Unidentified mushroom, possibly a troublesome knight mushroom in the Bruderwald forest in Bamberg. Focus stack of 15 images. --Ermell 06:49, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. But also slightly too yellowish. --Syntaxys 07:09, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
  Image is very good. Not grey but I wonder if this mushroom might be a Tricholoma scalpturatum (Yellowing Knight)? --GRDN711 00:09, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Ermell: fungi defined now as Pluteus cervinus. Update info, please --George Chernilevsky 15:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 22:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Spotted hyena (Crocuta crocuta), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:15, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

October 21, 2025

- Nomination Moscow - 2025 - Gorky Park --Юрий Д.К. 21:01, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Monastery in Chęciny, corridor. --Gower 20:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Sorry: The chapel is underexposed, disturbing luminance noise --F. Riedelio 15:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Adam Mickiewicz Park in Bytom. --Gower 20:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Tenement house, 23 Saint Marka street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland.jpg --Igor123121 19:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination Tenement house, 30 Saint Wawrzyńca street, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland.jpg --Igor123121 19:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. A few more specific categories before nomination would have been good --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Tenement house, 5 Mariacki square, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 19:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  PC is needed. --Екатерина Борисова 23:39, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Former Royal Arsenal, 64 Grodzka Street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 19:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Textures lacking detail. Dull light. Acceptable but not QI. --Gower 10:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Tenement house, 12 Józefa street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 19:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination View from the Effner bridge on the Oberstjägermeisterbach in the Englischer Garten in Munich --FlocciNivis 17:58, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Vue panoramique incluant Kasr Zemmour et les environs en fin de journée --Atef Ouni 11:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Beautiful scene. But the alignment seems wavy. The crop is tight and awkward, especially in the top left corner. A flare is distracting. The categories are sparse. --Milseburg 13:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination TTO ride-on mower at Agritechnica 2023 --MB-one 11:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 10:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Austin Cooper Mini in Berlin --MB-one 11:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Compression visible in dark areas, too tight crop. --Gower 10:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination 18th-century door and window of Tomregan Church, Ballyconnell, Co. Cavan, Ireland --AFBorchert 06:37, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 10:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:36, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Not sharp. For another person I would decide that it's unfixable, but let's see. --Lvova 15:15, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
  New version :) --Poco a poco 19:58, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Construction site of the Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed rail line in Strullendorf, looking north, aerial view --Ermell 05:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Support Good quality. --Gower 10:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: University of Adelaide main campus on 16 October 2025. By --Pangalau 04:51, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review It needs a perspective correction, the verticals are nmog straight --Michielverbeek 05:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
  Probably too high denoising, PC needed. --Gower 10:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination The christening train of the Basel S-Bahn of the Swiss Federal Railways (SBB) at Lörrach main station during the station festival "20 Years of Basel S-Bahn in Wiesental" on June 17, 2023. By --Ahmet Düz 04:43, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
  Oppose Head of train isn't very sharp, sorry. --Gower 10:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Posters of the Christoph Merian Foundation in Basel (Switzerland), with a parked bicycle. By --Ahmet Düz 04:43, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Comment Since the subject of the picture are the posters, it should be considered a derivative work, shouldn't it? --Harlock81 12:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

October 20, 2025

- Nomination: A red-faced warbler in Madera Canyon, Arizona --Polinova 15:35, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Nice, but something is wrong with the background, there are many diagonal artifacts. --Gower 18:17, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 06:35, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Purple chromatic aberration to fix around the white rocks. Otherwise acceptable. --Gower 10:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

October 19, 2025

- Nomination: Relief in uncomfortable position, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:15, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Pc is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 21:32, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
  Done --Екатерина Борисова 23:57, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: House complex Am Stadion (former educational center and now seat of parts of the city administration) with mosaics by Josep Renau --Romzig 08:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Right side leaning out, left side slightly leaning in --Poco a poco 11:37, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
  Thank you for the review. Both lines are straight. It just appears slightly tilted due to the perspective correction. --Romzig 13:44, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
  I don't get it, if you move the image from top to bottom you see that the gap to the border changes... --Poco a poco 20:09, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: 2025 ul. Wiślna 7, Kraków, Pałac Dembińskich --Igor123121 07:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  PC is needed --Екатерина Борисова 00:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Szczepańska 11 --Igor123121 07:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Horizontal alignment is needed. --Екатерина Борисова 01:27, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

October 18, 2025

- Nomination A path along the Isar in the floodplains of the Isar in Marzling --FlocciNivis 19:50, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  the signpost(?) just peeking into the frame on the right is a bit odd, maybe crop it out? --Acroterion 02:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
  Done --FlocciNivis 16:11, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
  Support Good quality now. --Harlock81 13:48, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Augustiańska 26-Węgłowa 4 --Igor123121 19:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  PC is needed --Екатерина Борисова 00:03, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: 2025, ul. Jagiellońska 10, Kraków --Igor123121 19:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  CA at the Windows, should probably just crop that off. --Plozessor 03:37, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Kamienica, Ulica Miodowa 15 --Igor123121 19:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  PC is needed --Екатерина Борисова 00:03, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Dome of Church of the Transfiguration at Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 17:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Generally good, but, how about reduction of burned whites and little red halo over the edges? --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
  Done Let's try so. --Vsatinet 11:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
  Still visible on the tower's left wall. --Lvova 12:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: 1984 Nissan Prairie JW-G --TTTNIS 11:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  A bit too soft. --Lvova 15:05, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Bay of Kotor at Stoliv / Montenegro --Imehling 10:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
  Horizon seems tilted. --Sebring12Hrs 12:18, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
  Done I've uploaded a new version --Imehling 18:30, 20 October 2025 (UTC) Support OK and QI in my opinion. --Milseburg 15:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: 2025, ul. Gołębia 24, Kraków, Collegium Novum Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego --Igor123121 06:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  PC is needed --Екатерина Борисова 00:05, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

October 17, 2025

- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Rynek Główny 9 --Igor123121 17:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  PC is needed --Екатерина Борисова 00:07, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
  PC fixed, but color noise and artifacts in dark areas to fix also. --Gower 18:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  It still needs PC (I mean horizontal alignment). --Екатерина Борисова 00:36, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Lesser flamingos (Phoeniconaias minor) and greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 17:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Not sharp --Екатерина Борисова 23:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
  I applied more sharpness --Poco a poco 08:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
  I'm still not ready to say that this image is sharp enough. --Екатерина Борисова 22:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
  Please, I ask for another opinion, this is going nowhere --Poco a poco 21:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
  Some birds were saved with processing, and some became sharp spots. --Lvova 12:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  Not sure what you mean --Poco a poco 14:14, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
  It seems tilted, otherwise ok. --Sebring12Hrs 02:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Tilted --Poco a poco 19:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

October 16, 2025

- Nomination: Dohm in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Remigius --Michielverbeek 05:16, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Near tower's cross there is a dust on sky to remove. Chceck perspective too, tower is slightly leaning, but maybe is isn't perfect in situ? --Gower 06:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC) Done Removed dust and small perspective improvement --Michielverbeek 07:03, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
  A bit dark and PC not done, look at right, it's leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 02:16, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  Thanks, I have Done a new perspective improvement and I made the church a bit brighter --Michielverbeek 22:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

October 15, 2025

- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 19:09, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Dust spot. See note. Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 12:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC) Not done in 8 days. --Peulle 12:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  @Sebring12Hrs: Done --Igor123121 18:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

October 14, 2025

- Nomination: 1995 Nissan Primera 2.0Tm S Selection --TTTNIS 13:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
  Looks like the denoising killed the detail. If you still have raw data available. Maybe it's fixable with better noise reduction. --MB-one 13:44, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Consensual review

Rules

These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.

To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.

Using {{support}} or {{oppose}} will make it easier to count your vote.

Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted

In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Oppose and Support if necessary.
Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".

File:Former_Kraków_Główny_railway_station,_1844_design._Peter_Rosenbaum,_1-3_Jan_Nowak-Jeziorański_Square,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg

Nomination Former Kraków Główny railway station, 1844 design. Peter Rosenbaum, 1-3 Jan Nowak-Jeziorański square, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Dust spots, posterized sky, noisy artifacts in the sky... --Sebring12Hrs 17:06, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs: Done --Igor123121 17:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  - Info Please don't cancel my vote, there is still posterization. --Sebring12Hrs 18:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Artefacts of digital processing and manual editing in the sky and near roof left corner --LexKurochkin 08:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 08:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:"Europejski"_Hotel,_5_Lubicz_street,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg

Nomination "Europejski" Hotel, 5 Lubicz street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 17:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs: Done --Igor123121 17:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  - Info Please don't cancel my vote, there is chroma noise everywhere. --Sebring12Hrs 18:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Visible noise. --LexKurochkin 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Nashville_warbler_immature_with_a_caterpillar_(53683).jpg

Nomination Immature Nashville warbler with a caterpillar --Rhododendrites 16:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. Beautifully caught! --AFBorchert 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very good, but something happened with the background, it has grid-like diagonal structures somewhere. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Gower: I cannot follow you here. I do not see that. --AFBorchert 23:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Support I see no problem with the background. DOF is questionable, but the head is sharp. --LexKurochkin 07:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --LexKurochkin 07:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Efremov_-_2025_-_chicory_flower.jpg

Nomination Cichorium intybus in Yefremov --Юрий Д.К. 13:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Petals burned out, lacking detail. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info Not burned out, natural colors of the flower at bright sunlight. I don't understand which details do you want to see on this simple flower. --Юрий Д.К. 17:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 08:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:La_Seine_musicale_(84847).jpg

Nomination La Seine vue du jardin de la Seine Musicale-- JackyM59 08:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Comment PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 09:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advise --JackyM59 15:15, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  - Oppose Sorry, perspective is ok, but sharpness is borderline. --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Clouds look oversharpened, many buildings are overexposed (white without details). --LexKurochkin 08:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 08:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Осенние_листья_в_Санкт-Петербурге_02.jpg

Nomination Leaves in autumn in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Lacking detail, sorry. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- What kind of details do you miss here? --Екатерина Борисова 01:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose In my opinion, the photo lacks detail. This is partly due to the use of a smartphone, which tends to produce something of a posterization effect. Unfortunately, the technical limitations of a smartphone quickly become apparent when it comes to fine details. --XRay 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --XRay 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Passerelle_Nord.jpg

Nomination Passerelle Nord vue du jardin de la Seine Musicale --JackyM59 20:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose PC is needed + bad sharpness/overprocessing by smartphone software. --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, my smartphone is not enough good. --JackyM59 09:14, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  - Info Some equipment just unable to produce QI (many smartphones, simple low quality lenses, etc.). Several Xiaomi models can take photos in RAW mode, if it is the case, try to process them yourself. Actually camera-JPEG is a bad idea even for some professional-level SLRs. --LexKurochkin 07:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 07:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Tallinn_Day_bus_festival,_Tallinn_(LRM_20220522_122109).jpg

Nomination Tallinn Bus Festival 2022 --MB-one 06:46, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Not a good perspective imo --Brihaspati 12:30, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment @Brihaspati: please! do NOT! use /Discussion instead of /Comment. Discussion means 'someone supported, I'm against it' or in reverse. 1 person is commenting, not discussing! :)) Lvova 18:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
  - @Brihaspati: Thank you for the review. Can you expand on what you don't like about the perspective? --MB-one 10:55, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp enough, imo. Everything except for the immediate centre is blurred or unsharp. Sending to CR as the comments above seemed confusing.--Peulle 13:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 07:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Villa_Ispahan,_Monaco.jpg

Nomination Villa Ispahan, Monaco. -- Florent Abel 23:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
PC is needed at right. --Sebring12Hrs 22:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Done --Florent Abel 00:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose More distance is needed. The distortion caused by the perspective correction at the top is excessive. --Lmbuga 23:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Narrow street.--Florent Abel 03:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Support Photo already taken from the largest possible distance. Better perspecitve would require a drone, or taking the picture from a window of the neighboring building. Still, could compress the upper part a bit (did that here: https://ibb.co/qMk1tcyd), but though that would look better, it would be a manipulation. --Plozessor 03:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Lmbuga. The building seems to be turned inside out, and both domes on the turrets, which are onion-shaped in the original, look wildly lopsided here. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Lmbuga and Екатерина Борисова. The crop also looks inadequate for the subject (its lower part). --LexKurochkin 07:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 07:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:El_Kbob_Mosque.jpg

Nomination El Kbob Mosque is a mosque for worship and educational purposesThis is a photo of the protected monument identified by the ID 82-86 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Bill.pix 21:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --JackyM59 21:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice photo, but not QI IMO: CAs (door), noise (or something else, sky), building cropped on the right side. The sky seems subexposed and not natural. Overprocesed IMO --Lmbuga 22:50, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak Support Really tight crop, but I think, exposure is ok for the sunlit white parts of the building. Some small remains of CA exist, but not disturbing in A4 size. --Smial 12:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --LexKurochkin 14:15, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambrussum_-_Pont.jpg

Nomination Ambrussum_-_Pont--JackyM59 07:42, 26 octobre 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Categories missing, geo location missing, a lot of dark shadows. Please try to fix it. --XRay 09:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Catégories done --JackyM59 13:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, no. You added randomly categories, most of the red links. --XRay 08:00, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Sorry that the photo ended up in the discussion. I made a mistake with the comment. --XRay 08:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --XRay 08:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambrussum_-_Remparts_Celtes.jpg

Nomination Ambrussum - Remparts Celtes--JackyM59 07:42, 26 octobre 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Gower 12:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Please add the categories first. --XRay 13:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Catégories done --JackyM59 13:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Again: No. Please do not add categories randomly. Have a look to COM:CAT. --XRay 08:02, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Support Ok now. --Sebring12Hrs 16:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

@Sebring12Hrs: Please have a look to the categories. They are not fixed. --XRay 08:02, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Sebring12Hrs 16:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Left_Front_Concorde_F-WTSA_Musee_Delta_Oct25_A7CR_07973.jpg

Nomination Left front view, Concorde F-WTSA at Musée Delta, Athis Mons --Tagooty 08:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 11:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose A bit noisy, a bit underexposed, a bit unsharp at left, and not the best crop. I would like to hear other opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 15:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Improved exposure and sharpness, NR in sky --Tagooty 18:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Support IMO OK, may be a touch too dark. --XRay 08:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --XRay 08:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:2025-07-06_UEFA_Women_EM_BS_030.jpg

Nomination Ball course with games and interactive stations in Basel. By --Ahmet Düz 08:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose There are some CAs and too much noise --Jakubhal 19:40, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:OutDoor_2018,_Friedrichshafen_(1X7A0261).jpg

Nomination Patagonia executive Ryan Gellert at OutDoor 2018 --MB-one 08:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Weak oppose Good technical quality but I don't think it's a QI with this arm cut on the left --Benjism89 09:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 11:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Info I'd like to read other comments about the left crop, I'm quite undecided myself. --Benjism89 20:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose because of the crop.--Peulle 08:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 14:11, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Statue_de_Martine_à_Tournai.jpg

Nomination Statue de Martine à Tournai--JackyM59 18:59, 25 octobre 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Needs PC (leaning left). Otherwise good. --Tagooty 19:13, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Fait - Crop left --JackyM59 08:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good now, thaks. --Tagooty 05:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
As far as I see, it was /Discuss instead of /Comment (again!), and there was no any need in CR. So I put QICresult without waiting. Lvova 14:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Comment In any case, the QIC is closed after 48 hours, even outside the CR section. --Sebring12Hrs 16:31, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted --Lvova 14:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Drogheda_Highlanes_Gallery_“View_of_Drogheda_from_Ball's_Grove”_by_Gabrielle_Ricciardelli_2024_08_23.jpg

Nomination Landscape painting of Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland, by Gabrielle Ricciardelli c. 1753/1755. Panorama based on 21 frames. --AFBorchert 08:51, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:05, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The right edge is blurred. I would like to hear other opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 13:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Everything is sharp enough to me. I do not see problems with sharpness. --LexKurochkin 07:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --LexKurochkin 07:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Oeufs_d'encornets_sur_une_plage_d'Hardelot.jpg

Nomination Oeufs d'encornets sur une plage d'Hardelot --JackyM59 17:28, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Good, but without categories--Lmbuga 18:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Categories were added by the author. --Lvova 12:38, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unidentified subject: Category:Céphalopodes. Études générales is a lie. I hope to hear from the user, but I think this is serious. The other category is Category:Mollusca. Very insufficient. Credible?--Lmbuga 21:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Himalayan_Tahr_at_Sagarmatha_National_Park,_Nepal_01.jpg

Nomination Male Himalayan Tahr (hemitragus jemlahicus) at the Sagarmatha National Park in Nepal. by User:Gurung pratap --UnpetitproleX 12:40, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Looks overprocessed to me, per my feedback on FPC --Poco a poco 14:21, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

May not be a FP, but I don't think it lacks in quality (compared to other images here). --UnpetitproleX 20:48, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose Parts of the face is blurred, and the established standard at QIC is that the face of the animal should be in focus, sorry.--Peulle 12:56, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:43, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1011_Pont_du_Gard_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

Nomination Aerial view of Pont du Gard, France (1) --Giles Laurent 00:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Implicite support. --Harlock81 09:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
In my opinion, a PC is necessary. --Lmbuga 00:26, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Completely overprocessed. Look at the background. --Sebring12Hrs 02:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. --Harlock81 09:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Info The Mavic Mini 4 Pro produces 48MP photos from a very tiny 1/1.3-inch sensor. You can not expect the pictures from this sensor to have the same sharpness and detail as a Full frame sensor. A picture should not be judged harder only because it has more MP in my opinion. Anyway I have uploaded a new version that demonstrates my point, you will see that with 50% size it doesn't look "overprocessed" anymore. That is the only way to have pictures with this sharpness with the Mavic Mini 4 Pro. What do you think of the new version Sebring12Hrs and Harlock81? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Reducing the resolution is not the solution, it's like sweeping the dust under the rug to hide. And if the problem comes from the camera, well that's it. Jacek Halicki's photos (he has a drone of the same brand but not the same model as his), make superb photos, why and how, I don't know, but the result has nothing to do with it. There we see throughout the photo that there is a problem, the textures are not at all natural, the trees, the stones, the water, the buildings, this is even more visible in the background. It looks like a kind of digital painting that has nothing to do with a photo, sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebring12Hrs (talk • contribs)

Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the explantion and the examples. However, I put it in a different way. If I take a picture with the camera of my phone, is it judged considering the camera capacity or evaluating the overall result? Of course, there is not a unique answer. In the best case, I think both. In this case, I understand that we are discussing about a limit of the instrumentation. Yet, it is difficult to say that the result is really good at the highest resolution. I would like to hear other opinions, and I might change also mine later. --Harlock81 16:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

@Harlock81 the reason I mentioned the material is because the DJI Mavic 4 Pro produces 48MP and the DJI Air produces 12MP photos. 12MP photos will always look much sharper than 48MP photos and therefore in my opinion a 48MP photo should not be judged harder than the 12MP version of it. Also, could you please check the updated version of the file? (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version) Thank you in advance. -- Giles Laurent 17:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

@Giles Laurent: I did, and I find the new version better than the other. However, after reading your point of you, I'm asking myself if the downscaling is really necessary. As said, I would like to hear other opinions. --Harlock81 (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

@Harlock81 if you think the image is now better do you still oppose (have you forgotten to update your previous votes to strike them?) ? If you don't oppose anymore, I would appreciate if you could update your votes, thank you in advance! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

I disagree, some 50 Mpx cameras take better pictures than DJI Mavic. --Sebring12Hrs 17:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Sebring12Hrs, I already explained that Full frame cameras can't be compared to tiny 1/1.3-inch sensor. Please try to link any 50mp drone picture made with a 1/1.3-inch sensor with higher detail and you will see it doesn't exist. -- Giles Laurent 18:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Comment If your equipment cannot take quality photos, that is not a reason to give it a pass, meaning that you should be less strict with the photos coming from your drone compared to 45 Mpx devices which take good ones. Sorry, but your arguments don't suit me at all. And again sorry, at worst others will give their opinion. --Sebring12Hrs 20:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

You don't seem to understand that it is not a question of equipment that I have or don't have but a question of physics in the realm of what is possible today with today's technology. The bigger the sensor in a camera, the more information it is able to record. If you have one 1/1.3-inch sensor that does 12 MP and a second 1/1.3-inch sensor that does 48 MP, the 12 MP photo taken in the 1/1.3-inch sensor will always look sharper than the 48 MP one. A 1/1.3-inch sensor is much smaller than a Full frame sensor and will always record less information than a full frame sensor.

You have talked about Jacek Halicki's drone photos. He uses a drone that does 12 MP photos, this means the 12 MP photo will look sharper than a 48 MP photo out of another drone with same sensor size than his drone.

If you compare this present candidate in the new updated 12 MP version (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version) you will find it sharper and more detailed than the 12 MP shots from Jacek that you take for reference for QI bar of drone shot.

In summary, the old version of the present candidate was already of QI level to me and with the new version of the present candidate it is even way more above QI level in my opinion -- Giles Laurent 20:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Click here for a side by side comparison -- Giles Laurent 21:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose Per others. After rereading everything, I think the photo is useful for Wikimedia Commons, but that the instrument used is not suitable for QI. I insist that perspective correction is needed.--Lmbuga 21:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

@Lmbuga so according to you all shots from a Mavic Mini 4 Pro can't be QI just because the drone records the image in 48MP instead of 12MP? There is a setting in the drone to record the image directly in 12 MP instead of 48 MP, I don't see why this couldn't be used or why it wouldn't be possible to reduce the picture size to match the 12 MP of drones that only have the 12 MP option. Regarding the perspective correction I don't think that's needed for a drone shot, this is normal perspective -- Giles Laurent 22:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Info @Harlock81, Lmbuga and Sebring12Hrs, I was mistaken and Jacek's drone is the DJI Air 3S (FC9113 camera is the DJI Air 3S wide-angle camera). The DJI Air 3S wide angle camera native resolution is 8192 x 6144 (50 MP) but Jacek's uploads are approximately 4000 pixels wide or less, which means they were all reduced in size by 50%. This once again completely demonstrates what I was saying. The only way to have a sharp shot with any 50MP drone is by downsizing it. So can you please explain why you think Jacek's reduced size shots are acceptable but not the present candidates? Should honesty be discouraged and candidates that admit reducing image size be disadvantaged over those who don’t say anything so that no one sees it? Please look this side by side comparison. To me the present candidate is clearly of QI and I don't see why one user would be allowed to reduce the size of his drone shots to 12 MP and not other ones. To be clear, I'm not saying Jacek's drone photos shouldn't be QI, they rightfully are. I'm saying that the present candidate should also be QI and should also be allowed to be in 50% since other users do that too -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:00, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The picture is now reduced to 12 MP, but still the overall quality isn't very good - lots of NR artifacts, lack of detail, overprocessed textures. It's under the QI bar for me - "but the camera can't do better" is not a valid argument IMO. Related, the Mavic Mini 4 Pro has a gimbal, so was it really necessary to take the picture at 1/3200s and ISO 150? Lower ISO would have produced a better result despite the small sensor. --Plozessor 03:55, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

@Plozessor, I don't see where you see "lack of detail" because I see all individual leafs of the closest trees from the left and right side. ISO 100 or ISO 150 have barely no difference at all and yes 1/3200s was necessary because a slower shutter speed would have resulted in blown highlights. -- Giles Laurent 08:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

The "Lack of detail" can be debated - it's probably ok for that type of camera, though on other pictures of that same bridge, the structure and the individual bricks are much more visible. Still it's somehow overprocessed/overcontrasted (visible at the leaves and also at the water edges) and there's the tilt of course. But ... why do you think that with ISO 100 and 1/2000s the highlights would blow and with ISO 150 and 1/3200s they would not? --Plozessor 15:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

@Plozessor I'm sorry but you can not compare a photo taken from 10m distance to a photo taken at 150 m distance. Also you can not compare visibility of tiles for a picture taken with the sun high which casts shadows between tiles to a picture taken at golden hour in winter with a much lower sun illuminating the holes between the tiles. The monument in this photo has more than enough detail considering the distance of the subject and lighting situation and is well above QI bar. I don't see oversharpening on the leafs and if that is the only issue that can easily be softened. Mathematically if exposure is perfect at ISO 150 and shutter speed 1/3200, you could use a shutter speed as slow as 1/2133.33 and anything lower would be inevitably cause overexposure so 1/2000s in this situation in combination with ISO 100 would overexpose because cameras don't have a 1/2133.33 setting. So it would be a setting of 1/2500s to go for a ISO 100. However as I have already explained, there is barely no difference at all between ISO 150 1/3200s and ISO 100 1/2500s so that would make no visual difference. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Comment I think uploading a 12MP is acceptable here: neither the Mavic Mini Pro 4 nor the Mavic Air 3S have true 48MP sensors, at least in the conventional sense. They use Sony's Quad Bayer tech, which groups adjacent pixels in 2x2 groups. By default, these drones take 12MP images by using each 2x2 group as a pixel but also have an option to take 48MP shots by using each individual pixel. I gave up using the 48MP option because I didn't think the little extra detail made up for the increased interpolation errors and reduced dynamic range, but your mileage may vary. In any case, I agree with others that your 12MP looks over-processed (sharpening halos and noise reduction smudges), it should be possible to get a cleaner image out of this sensor. --Julesvernex2 21:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

@Julesvernex2 thank you for your comment. It's good to see someone with technical knowledge. Thank you for acknowledging that drones with 48 MP quad bayer sensors shouldn't have their images necessarily in 48 MP and that 12 MP is acceptable in such cases. I've just uploaded right now a new reworked version with no sharpening, only selective denoise on some areas (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version). Could you please tell me what you think of it? Thank you in advance! -- Giles Laurent 22:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Sebring12Hrs 20:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1012_Pont_du_Gard_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

Nomination Aerial view of Pont du Gard, France (2) --Giles Laurent 00:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Implicite support. --Harlock81 09:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
In my opinion, a PC is necessary. --Lmbuga 00:26, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Completely overprocessed. Look at the background. --Sebring12Hrs 02:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. --Harlock81 09:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Info The Mavic Mini 4 Pro produces 48MP photos from a very tiny 1/1.3-inch sensor. You can not expect the pictures from this sensor to have the same sharpness and detail as a Full frame sensor. A picture should not be judged harder only because it has more MP in my opinion. Anyway I have uploaded a new version that demonstrates my point, you will see that with 50% size it doesn't look "overprocessed" anymore. That is the only way to have pictures with this sharpness with the Mavic Mini 4 Pro. What do you think of the new version Sebring12Hrs and Harlock81? -- Giles Laurent 15:23, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Reducing the resolution is not the solution, it's like sweeping the dust under the rug to hide. And if the problem comes from the camera, well that's it. Jacek Halicki's photos (he has a drone of the same brand but not the same model as his), make superb photos, why and how, I don't know, but the result has nothing to do with it. There we see throughout the photo that there is a problem, the textures are not at all natural, the trees, the stones, the water, the buildings, this is even more visible in the background. It looks like a kind of digital painting that has nothing to do with a photo, sorry.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebring12Hrs (talk • contribs)

Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:57, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Click here for a side by side comparison -- Giles Laurent 21:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose Per others. After rereading everything, I think the photo is useful for Wikimedia Commons, but that the instrument used is not suitable for QI. I insist that perspective correction is needed.--Lmbuga 21:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

@Lmbuga so according to you all shots from a Mavic Mini 4 Pro can't be QI just because the drone records the image in 48MP instead of 12MP? There is a setting in the drone to record the image directly in 12 MP instead of 48 MP, I don't see why this couldn't be used or why it wouldn't be possible to reduce the picture size to match the 12 MP of drones that only have the 12 MP option. Regarding the perspective correction I don't think that's needed for a drone shot, this is normal perspective. Anyway, the perspective was edited in this shot to see how it looks and it seems you don't even see the difference with and without perspective correction so why would you require it? If the perspective still isn't right in your eyes please tell me exactly what is the problem according to you. -- Giles Laurent 22:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Info @Harlock81, Lmbuga and Sebring12Hrs, I was mistaken and Jacek's drone is the DJI Air 3S (FC9113 camera is the DJI Air 3S wide-angle camera). The DJI Air 3S wide angle camera native resolution is 8192 x 6144 (50 MP) but Jacek's uploads are approximately 4000 pixels wide or less, which means they were all reduced in size by 50%. This once again completely demonstrates what I was saying. The only way to have a sharp shot with any 50MP drone is by downsizing it. So can you please explain why you think Jacek's reduced size shots are acceptable but not the present candidates? Should honesty be discouraged and candidates that admit reducing image size be disadvantaged over those who don’t say anything so that no one sees it? Please look this side by side comparison. To me the present candidate is clearly of QI and I don't see why one user would be allowed to reduce the size of his drone shots to 12 MP and not other ones. To be clear, I'm not saying Jacek's drone photos shouldn't be QI, they rightfully are. I'm saying that the present candidate should also be QI and should also be allowed to be in 50% since other users do that too -- Giles Laurent 23:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Harlock81 09:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1013_Pont_du_Gard_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

Nomination Aerial view of Pont du Gard, France (3) --Giles Laurent 00:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Implicite support. --Harlock81 09:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
In my opinion, a PC is necessary. --Lmbuga 00:26, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Completely overprocessed. Look at the background. --Sebring12Hrs 02:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. --Harlock81 09:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Info The Mavic Mini 4 Pro produces 48MP photos from a very tiny 1/1.3-inch sensor. You can not expect the pictures from this sensor to have the same sharpness and detail as a Full frame sensor. A picture should not be judged harder only because it has more MP in my opinion. Anyway I have uploaded a new version that demonstrates my point, you will see that with 50% size it doesn't look "overprocessed" anymore. That is the only way to have pictures with this sharpness with the Mavic Mini 4 Pro. What do you think of the new version Sebring12Hrs and Harlock81? -- Giles Laurent 15:23, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Reducing the resolution is not the solution, it's like sweeping the dust under the rug to hide. And if the problem comes from the camera, well that's it. Jacek Halicki's photos (he has a drone of the same brand but not the same model as his), make superb photos, why and how, I don't know, but the result has nothing to do with it. There we see throughout the photo that there is a problem, the textures are not at all natural, the trees, the stones, the water, the buildings, this is even more visible in the background. It looks like a kind of digital painting that has nothing to do with a photo, sorry.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebring12Hrs (talk • contribs)

Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Click here for a side by side comparison -- Giles Laurent 21:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose Per others. After rereading everything, I think the photo is useful for Wikimedia Commons, but that the instrument used is not suitable for QI. I insist that perspective correction is needed.--Lmbuga 21:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

@Lmbuga so according to you all shots from a Mavic Mini 4 Pro can't be QI just because the drone records the image in 48MP instead of 12MP? There is a setting in the drone to record the image directly in 12 MP instead of 48 MP, I don't see why this couldn't be used or why it wouldn't be possible to reduce the picture size to match the 12 MP of drones that only have the 12 MP option. Regarding the perspective correction I don't think that's needed for a drone shot, this is normal perspective -- Giles Laurent 22:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Info @Harlock81, Lmbuga and Sebring12Hrs, I was mistaken and Jacek's drone is the DJI Air 3S (FC9113 camera is the DJI Air 3S wide-angle camera). The DJI Air 3S wide angle camera native resolution is 8192 x 6144 (50 MP) but Jacek's uploads are approximately 4000 pixels wide or less, which means they were all reduced in size by 50%. This once again completely demonstrates what I was saying. The only way to have a sharp shot with any 50MP drone is by downsizing it. So can you please explain why you think Jacek's reduced size shots are acceptable but not the present candidates? Should honesty be discouraged and candidates that admit reducing image size be disadvantaged over those who don’t say anything so that no one sees it? Please look this side by side comparison. To me the present candidate is clearly of QI and I don't see why one user would be allowed to reduce the size of his drone shots to 12 MP and not other ones. To be clear, I'm not saying Jacek's drone photos shouldn't be QI, they rightfully are. I'm saying that the present candidate should also be QI and should also be allowed to be in 50% since other users do that too -- Giles Laurent 23:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Harlock81 09:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:1015_Pont_du_Gard_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg

Nomination Aerial view of Pont du Gard, France (4) --Giles Laurent 00:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Implicite support. --Harlock81 09:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
In my opinion, a PC is necessary. --Lmbuga 00:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Completely overprocessed. Look at the background. --Sebring12Hrs 02:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. --Harlock81 09:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Info The Mavic Mini 4 Pro produces 48MP photos from a very tiny 1/1.3-inch sensor. You can not expect the pictures from this sensor to have the same sharpness and detail as a Full frame sensor. A picture should not be judged harder only because it has more MP in my opinion. Anyway I have uploaded a new version that demonstrates my point, you will see that with 50% size it doesn't look "overprocessed" anymore. That is the only way to have pictures with this sharpness with the Mavic Mini 4 Pro. What do you think of the new version Sebring12Hrs and Harlock81? -- Giles Laurent 15:23, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Reducing the resolution is not the solution, it's like sweeping the dust under the rug to hide. And if the problem comes from the camera, well that's it. Jacek Halicki's photos (he has a drone of the same brand but not the same model as his), make superb photos, why and how, I don't know, but the result has nothing to do with it. There we see throughout the photo that there is a problem, the textures are not at all natural, the trees, the stones, the water, the buildings, this is even more visible in the background. It looks like a kind of digital painting that has nothing to do with a photo, sorry.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebring12Hrs (talk • contribs)

Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:57, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Click here for a side by side comparison -- Giles Laurent 21:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose Per others. After rereading everything, I think the photo is useful for Wikimedia Commons, but that the instrument used is not suitable for QI. I insist that perspective correction is needed.--Lmbuga 21:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

@Lmbuga so according to you all shots from a Mavic Mini 4 Pro can't be QI just because the drone records the image in 48MP instead of 12MP? There is a setting in the drone to record the image directly in 12 MP instead of 48 MP, I don't see why this couldn't be used or why it wouldn't be possible to reduce the picture size to match the 12 MP of drones that only have the 12 MP option. Regarding the perspective correction I don't think that's needed for a drone shot, this is normal perspective -- Giles Laurent 22:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Info @Harlock81, Lmbuga and Sebring12Hrs, I was mistaken and Jacek's drone is the DJI Air 3S (FC9113 camera is the DJI Air 3S wide-angle camera). The DJI Air 3S wide angle camera native resolution is 8192 x 6144 (50 MP) but Jacek's uploads are approximately 4000 pixels wide or less, which means they were all reduced in size by 50%. This once again completely demonstrates what I was saying. The only way to have a sharp shot with any 50MP drone is by downsizing it. So can you please explain why you think Jacek's reduced size shots are acceptable but not the present candidates? Should honesty be discouraged and candidates that admit reducing image size be disadvantaged over those who don’t say anything so that no one sees it? Please look this side by side comparison. To me the present candidate is clearly of QI and I don't see why one user would be allowed to reduce the size of his drone shots to 12 MP and not other ones. To be clear, I'm not saying Jacek's drone photos shouldn't be QI, they rightfully are. I'm saying that the present candidate should also be QI and should also be allowed to be in 50% since other users do that too -- Giles Laurent 23:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Harlock81 09:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Kalyan_Minaret_in_Bukhara.jpg

Nomination Kalyan Minaret in Bukhara. -- 26D 08:08, 25 October (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 18:09, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Not bad, but there's a halo along the contour of the minaret, and the bottom part of image is blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 00:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Perhaps it is a personal issue due to my tastes that I do not like the composition: too tight at the top and cropped at the bottom.--Lmbuga 21:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I can't see the halo, I can see blurred edges, but no halo. However, the bottom part of the image is very poor. --Lmbuga 21:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
  - Ah!, the halo is visible in the thumbnail, but not in the photo itself?--Lmbuga 21:51, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
    - Yeah, the halo is almost invisible in full size, but it's clearly visible in the thumbnail and in 450 × 600 pixels standard preview. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Harlock81 09:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Minorai_kalonning_tepa_qismi.jpg

Nomination The upper part of the Kalyan Minaret. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:02, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:10, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Implicite support. --Harlock81 09:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but that sky color doesn't look real, it needs a WB rework --Poco a poco 14:18, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Implicite oppose. --Harlock81 09:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco--Lmbuga 21:57, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Harlock81 09:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Altendorf_Buttenheim_Eisenbahn_Baustelle_Luftbild-20250831-RM-111536.jpg

Nomination Construction site of the Nuremberg-Ebensfeld high-speed rail line in Buttenheim, aerial view --Ermell 05:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Overprocessed, gouache effect. --Lvova 12:43, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
I disagree. --Ermell 19:35, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I agree with Lvova. All the man-made elements are generally well defined, but the natural elements and the ground present the gouache effect reported by Lvova. --Harlock81 09:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per -Lvova--Lmbuga 22:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Lvova. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 15:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 15:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Camelus_bactrianus_skull_in_Jardim_Zoológico_de_Curitiba.jpg

Nomination Camelus bactrianus skull in Jardim Zoológico de Curitiba --Wilfredor 01:06, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Nice but background is weird, partially removed, partially not, somewhere with geometric black (bat-like?) shapes. --Gower 21:13, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too much noisy and overporcessed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:08, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
I uploaded a new version --Wilfredor 13:09, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
It's way better now. Only one spot to correct, I added imagenote. --Gower 18:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Done @Gower and Sebring12Hrs: Please take a look te new version. Thanks --Wilfredor 18:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Support now it is ok --Gower 20:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Too blurred to me. --Sebring12Hrs 22:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Gower 20:22, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Strullendorf_Bahnhof_Baustelle_Luftbild-20250831-RM-115224.jpg

Nomination Strullendorf station during the expansion of the Nuremberg-Erfurt high-speed rail line. View looking south. --Ermell 06:49, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Too high contrast (blacks clipped), AC to fix (lower part). --Gower 21:02, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:06, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Blacks are significantly clipped. --Gower 18:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Implicite oppose. --Harlock81 09:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose CAS or artifacts, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 18:06, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Impressive photo, but overprocessed. It is quite visible in central part with grass and ground areas and on far part of the railroad. --LexKurochkin 15:15, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 15:15, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:The_three_temples_of_Sbeitla_04.jpg

Nomination The three temples of Sbeitla and the arch of Antoninus and Marcus Aurelius in a landscape --IssamBarhoumi 16:31, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Good, but small. --Lvova 15:17, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
dear Lvova I improved the file size and light have a lok please --IssamBarhoumi 20:40, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Thank you. Good quality. --Lvova 10:45, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose @IssamBarhoumi we need EV here, like in first or second. Too dark. --PetarM 09:07, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
dear PetarM I reverted it to the second one ... I thought that with this kind of darkness there will be good focus on the temples but now it is more illuminated hve a look please --IssamBarhoumi 15:21, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Harlock81 09:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia_Asian_Month_Banner_(awa).svg

Nomination Wikipedia Asian Month Banner for Awadhi --Suyash.dwivedi 16:15, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Resolution under 2 MP, sorry. --Gower 06:58, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
This is a SVG file, which are infinitely scalable; MP is not relevant here. That being said, I'm unsure how I feel about an image being submitted for QI when the key graphic (File:Wikipedia Asian Month Logo.svg) is QI already. --ReneeWrites 21:32, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose per ReneeWrites.--Peulle 08:01, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Harlock81 09:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Farm_tractor.jpg

Nomination A tractor in Nigeria. By user:Sasu photography. --Lvova 19:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Dust spot in the sky, underexposed, and noisy. And why ISO 400 in bright daylight? --Plozessor 02:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 21:32, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco.... --Sebring12Hrs 11:01, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per my initial comment which has not been addressed. --Plozessor 03:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Several dust spots (Many dust spots!). Overprocessed, oversaturated and underexposed IMO. Perhaps vignetting--Lmbuga 22:06, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per others Jakubhal 20:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Very impressive photo, but noise in the sky, multiple dust spots, shadows are too dark, too blue white balance. Sorry and moral support. --LexKurochkin 06:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 06:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Владимир_2025,_Княгинин_монастырь,_Успенский_собор_03.jpg

Nomination Cathedral of the Dormition of the Theotokos in Knyaginin Monastery, Vladimir --Vsatinet 19:20, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Crushed blacks, clipped whites --Gower 06:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Actually not, details in shadows and highlights are present. Although the ability to see them, of course, depends on the capabilities of the output device (monitor settings and characteristics, etc.). Okay, let's consider the option with lower contrast in the shadows (I don't see any issues in the highlights, anyway). --Vsatinet 17:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Nice picture but whites and blacks still clipped and it's not matter of monitor, it can by tested objectively by histogram. --Gower 18:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Let's see what others think. --Sebring12Hrs 02:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment I can't see significant clipping, there are some details in the shadows, but probably it wouldn't hurt to brighten the shadows a bit. Also, the overall quality is borderline. It was taken at ISO 400 with 1/400s, should probably have used lower ISO with longer exposure. And I'm not sure about the perspective - the building seems straight but the background (like the radio tower) is not. --Plozessor 05:50, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Support looks ok to me.--Ermell 09:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Ermell 09:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Петергоф,_Эрмитаж_после_реставрации_06.jpg

Nomination Window of Hermitage pavilion (view from the ground), Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:07, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Needs perspective correction --E bailey 03:51, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

This is a bottom-up view, as indicated in the description, and from this position PC has already been done. --Екатерина Борисова 22:56, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose Not bad, but I expect truly parallel PC in that case. --Gower 18:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Why do you need "truly parallels" here and don't need them there, for example? There's a difference between an obvious perspective view and a frontal shot taken crookedly, so I don't understand your logic. --Екатерина Борисова 00:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose IMO doesn't qualify as a perspective shot, thus verticals should be vertical. As they are in the Example given by Екатерина. --Plozessor 05:53, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- In my example verticals are vertical, but horizons are not horizontal. I take it that no one cares about that? -- Екатерина Борисова 01:35, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
  - Indeed, the picture was taken from the side, so it's expected the horizontals are not horizontal. As it is on many architecture photos that were taken from corners - see many examples in Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors. --Plozessor 04:02, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
    - I do understand what side views looks like. But my example is not the case when a side view is needed and adds something to the image, since, judging by the pictures in the category, the building is low, its facade is clearly visible from the street, and it's not difficult to take an even frontal shot. Therefore, it is not a side view. It's just a crooked picture. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per others --Lmbuga 22:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Harlock81 09:00, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Jirafa_Masai_(Giraffa_camelopardalis_tippelskirchi),_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_77.jpg

Nomination Masai giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis tippelskirchi), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 20:27, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:31, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
~~Oppose~~ The sky is unacceptable-- Ввласенко 15:02, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Now is better. -- Ввласенко 10:59, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Bright, but not blown white --George Chernilevsky 15:26, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Support per George Chernilevsky --LexKurochkin 10:22, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
~~Support~~ Good quality--Lmbuga 11:39, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- I voted twice without meaning to.--Lmbuga 16:50, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Support ok --Gower 17:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Салоники,_кошка_на_28_Октября.jpg

Nomination Cat at 28 Oktovirou Street, Thessaloniki, Greece. --Красный 03:26, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose It isn't bad, but cat should take up most of the frame aera. Cropping in that case doesn't help, sorry. --Gower 07:24, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
I can't agree with this. It is possible to show not only a cat, but a cat in some surroundings, I don't see this exact framing as a poblem. --Красный 15:29, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose agree with Gower. Composition is flawed. --E bailey 16:51, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak support I think it's worth making some horizontal crop, but in general, such a composition has a right to exist. I see no reason to vote against it. -- Екатерина Борисова 00:59, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Per Екатерина, I would suggest a square crop. --Plozessor 03:22, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Per above.--Ermell 09:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promote? --Ermell 09:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:University_of_Adelaide_main_campus_on_16_October_2025_-_02.jpg

Nomination Elder Conservatorium, Adelaide on 16 October 2025. By --Pangalau 04:51, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Decline
Support Good quality. --Romzig 21:01, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Lower part too blurry, sorry. --Gower 21:02, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Too blurry and needs perspective correction --LexKurochkin 11:33, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per LexKurochkin. According to EXIF data it was taken in portrait mode with intentionally low DoF. --Plozessor 03:23, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Sebring12Hrs 07:25, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Кирочная_22_07.jpg

Nomination Damaged balcony in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:42, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Good, but PC needed. It is not straight, parallel. Look at the facade on the right. --Gower 15:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Yes, it's a view from the ground to the balcony on 5th floor of this building. Balconies always look like this if you don't use a copter for shooting. --Екатерина Борисова 00:21, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose Yes, PC is needed. Not a low-angle shot. --Sebring12Hrs 10:55, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
I made some PC to make the picture look neater (see the first version), but I don't think it's necessary to pretend that I can fly at the fifth floor level. Yes, this is a picture from the ground, and balconies always looks like this from there. Other opinions on this are interesting, as this is a common problem. --Екатерина Борисова 01:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
I understand, but it makes non sense to me to see the right leaning more than the left side on your picture. --Sebring12Hrs 10:54, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Look at the general appearance of the building in the category, and then you will understand why it looks like this. This is not to argue, but just for information. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose Sure you cannot "fly at the fifth floor level", but now it looks like you were flying at the fourth floor level. Verticals are already almost straight, so why not skew it a little bit more to have them completely straight? It would look much better IMO. --Plozessor 03:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

I tried to do this, but as a result, the view becomes unnatural, because if the picture is absolutely straight like it's a real frontal view, then how can the bottom of the balcony be visible at the same time? Therefore, this version is a reasonable compromise. I am not chasing status, as I have said more than once before, but I would like the pursuit of verticality not to become an end in itself in QI project. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose nothing was corrected. --Gower 17:33, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --Plozessor 03:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:View_of_the_fortified_city_of_Carcassonne_(1).jpg

Nomination View of the fortified city of Carcassonne, Aude, France. --Tournasol7 13:23, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Decline
A bit blurred at left, and not completely in focus. Other opinions ? --Sebring12Hrs 14:01, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Gower 15:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I would hear others opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 10:53, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose DOF problems --LexKurochkin 11:16, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Left third is oof. --Plozessor 03:28, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Sebring12Hrs 07:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:20250706_Transcendiendo_la_imposición_del_cuerpo.jpg

Nomination The restored sculpture Transcendiendo la imposición del cuerpo in Plaza Luis de León Huerta, Icod de los Vinos, Tenerifer, Spain --FlocciNivis 17:53, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose The inscription is unsharp. --Екатерина Борисова 22:44, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Edited Екатерина Борисова vote to "oppose". LexKurochkin 10:10, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Support The statue is sharp, and, I think, the description below is not the subject of this photo. Let's discuss. --LexKurochkin 09:49, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 11:45, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Wondering how the inscription seems more blurry than the concrete around it, but anyway - the subject is the statue and that is very good. --Plozessor 03:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Info To me it looks like the plate with inscription is heavily damaged, so, possibly, it is sharp on the photo but the edges of letters are physically unsharpened by erosion in reality. --LexKurochkin 07:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --Plozessor 03:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Bytom_Rozbark_MTW_100.110_778_2021.jpg

Nomination MTW 100.110 series train, nr 778 (PKP Energetyka SA) in Bytom. --Gower 20:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Decline
Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:23, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I disagree. It's tilted, the shadows are too dark and it's not sharp enough for QI. --JoachimKohler-HB 13:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

tilt is intentional because of leaning train on tracks --Gower 15:15, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Oppose The houses are leaning.--Peulle 11:18, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Upper part of the train's front is out of focus. And perspective is inconsistent. You can use the train as reference (and make its verticals vertical), or you can use the houses in the background as reference, but none of these two is currently applied. --Plozessor 03:40, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 07:42, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Thessaloniki_during_CEEM_2025_01.jpg

Nomination Pedestrian zone in Thessaloniki. I prefer not to crop to show this empty sunny area. --Lvova 09:30, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
Decline
With that crop, I'll have to vote Oppose. Send to CR, if you change your mind. --MB-one 13:44, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm sending to CR without changing my mind. --Lvova 16:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Support I don't know how Lvova do it with her smartphone, but everything is sharp here. --Sebring12Hrs 17:13, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Tends to suggest that smartphones are generally less good than cameras. The quality of the One Plus 13 is very impressive to me. Good job. --Sebring12Hrs 17:16, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I understand the intended purpose, but the composition of the image is unbalanced. Furthermore, there is no meaningful description of the image, and the image sharpness is only mediocre. --Smial 11:33, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Smial --Lmbuga 15:36, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Unbalanced composition with too much pavement. I'd crop it below the yellow bike lane marking. Sharpness is borderline, but parts (for example, the water surface) are overprocessed. --Plozessor 03:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Peulle 07:42, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Параклис_во_Тресонче_(2).jpg

Nomination St. Petka Church in the village Tresonče. By User:Petrovskyz --Lvova 07:37, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Support Good quality. --Ercé 09:26, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose The wall of the house is blurred at right, and the background is blurres too, look at the trees. --Sebring12Hrs 11:33, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I'm not too bothered about the background, but the house not being sharp is a problem, since it's the subject.--Peulle 11:19, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak Support. Horrible bokeh, but sharpness is good enough (A4 print size criterion). --Smial 11:25, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs--Lmbuga 15:33, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Not perfect, but over the bar for me. --Plozessor 03:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Peulle --LexKurochkin 12:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 12:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

File:Петергоф,_Нижний_парк,_Оранжерейный_сад,_рудбекия_01.jpg

Nomination Rudbeckia laciniata in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose Too messy composition for me, two species together almost mixed. Flowers aren't very detailed. --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
"two species together" as an argument; I cannot read it, stop it. --Lvova 08:29, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Guidelines: „Foreground and background objects should not be distracting” --Gower 17:44, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Support The composition is good to me here. And the sharpness acceptable. --Sebring12Hrs 21:10, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak support Юрий Д.К. 06:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Sharpness rather below the bar, overexposed areas. And Gower's argument is valid, the description should mention both species --Poco a poco 21:23, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Comment Gower's argument was about something else, but I've improved the description as far as you're not satisfied with categories only. -- Екатерина Борисова 00:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Anna.Massini 12:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
Support Very nice composition, good lighting, acceptabel sharpness, and now also good image description ;-) --Smial 11:37, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 10:06, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Oppose Parts of the flowers are overexposed. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → More votes? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Timetable (day 8 after nomination)

Mon 20 Oct → Tue 28 Oct
Tue 21 Oct → Wed 29 Oct
Wed 22 Oct → Thu 30 Oct
Thu 23 Oct → Fri 31 Oct
Fri 24 Oct → Sat 01 Nov
Sat 25 Oct → Sun 02 Nov
Sun 26 Oct → Mon 03 Nov
Mon 27 Oct → Tue 04 Nov
Tue 28 Oct → Wed 05 Nov